Laserfiche WebLink
CLOSED CITY COUNCIL MEETING JULY 25, 1994 <br />Mr. Golembeck said it is his opinion that if the matter goes to <br />trail, the judge will rule in favor of the RPEHA. It appears <br />that the judge feels that the City is using a "heavy hand" in the <br />matter. Mr. Golembeck further noted that during the <br />consideration of the final plat, the City Council directed the <br />City Attorney to review the RPEHA's by-laws. Why would the City <br />do this when the by-laws affect only the operation of the <br />association? This action is being interpreted as the City's <br />attempt to determine the use of the outlots. Mr. Sullivan said <br />it could be argued that the City always reviews by-laws. <br />There is testimony from Mr. Miller that the outlots are in a <br />flood plain and cannot be used for residential purposes. Since <br />the RPEHA wanted to use the outlots, they did not plead a <br />"taking" claim. <br />Mr. Golembeck explained that the destruction of the boat launch <br />does not look good for the City. If the matter goes to a jury <br />and it is a fact that people took action to deprive the RPEHA of <br />their rights, the City may be required to pay the RPEHA attorneys <br />fees. <br />Mr. Golembeck also noted that if the actions of the persons who <br />destroyed the boat launch can be associated with the City, the <br />City may not be covered by insurance. <br />Mr. Golembeck noted that every judge in the matter has "implored" <br />settlement. He explained that if the City can draft a suitable <br />settlement, the City will retain control in the matter. However, <br />if the matter goes to trial, the final outcome will be out of the <br />control of the City. If the RPEHA loses the case, they will <br />appeal. <br />Mayor Reinert said that the RPEHA has never exercised their right <br />to apply for a rezone of the two (2) outlots so that they could <br />be used for something other than residential. Mr. Golembeck said <br />that the RPEHA feels that they were granted a right to use the <br />outlots for recreational purposes when the final plat was <br />approved and they do not have to get any other approvals from the <br />City. <br />Mayor Reinert referred to the most recent settlement proposal and <br />said that there were many issues in the proposal that needed to <br />be refined. He said his position remains the same, the RPEHA <br />should apply for a rezone of the property and go through the <br />proper channels for approval. Council Member Kuether said they <br />feel that they would have to go through the Planning and Zoning <br />Board process and the actions of the chairman of board would <br />indicate that they would not get anywhere with a proposal. Mr. <br />PAGE 2 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />