Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 22, 1994 <br />feet in width, there was a street stubbed to the Walseth <br />property. The staff review and Planning and Zoning Board review <br />in April indicated that this plat was unacceptable. Staff <br />recommended elimination of a number of lots to reduce the density <br />and bring the PDO up to a standard which consists of interior lot <br />widths of 85 feet, and meeting R -1X area standards. Where <br />wetlands were being imposed some flexibility on lot size would be <br />acceptable providing the lots had at least a R-1 standard of <br />10,800 square feet. The standard for a corner lot is 105 feet in <br />width. Mr. Brixius said he did suggest to the developer that he <br />request a PDO however, the suggestion was not open blank check to <br />pursue flexibility. Performance standards established included <br />lot widths of at least 85 feet based on what is necessary to <br />accommodate a R -1X house. <br />In response to staff suggestions, a preliminary plat dated May 5, <br />1994 was submitted to staff which included some alterations in <br />the wetlands delineations. In additions some changes occurred in <br />the northern portion of the plat (north of Holly Drive). The <br />access into the Walseth property was eliminated due to an <br />expressed concern of Ms. Walseth. The lots were increased in <br />size and there were considerations of some different street <br />configurations but major changes were not made. Generally the <br />street design follows the same configuration as shown on the <br />March submission, only the lot sizes and lot configurations have <br />changed slightly to reduce density and meet the performance <br />standards set by staff. <br />The Planning and Zoning Board considered the PDO request and <br />preliminary plat in April and May and recommended against the PDO <br />and requested that a R -1X plat be submitted. In May a R -1X <br />concept was submitted showing 104 lots and again the Planning and <br />Zoning Board said that they did not want to consider a PDO <br />zoning. <br />At the August, 1994 Planning and Zoning Board meeting, the <br />applicant submitted a drawing for the City Council to review. <br />The intention of the applicant was to submit a plan that was <br />recommended by staff after the May, 1994 Planning and Zoning <br />Board meeting. The plan (submission) was received on August 1, <br />1994 and shows that the northern portion (north of Holly Drive) <br />is identical to what was submitted in the May, 1994 Planning and <br />Zoning Board meeting. Everything south of Holly Drive is <br />identical to what was submitted to the Planning and Zoning Board <br />at the March, 1994 Planning and Zoning Board meeting. The <br />Planning and Zoning Board has seen this design at previous <br />meetings. At no time was the plat submitted at the April, 1994 <br />Planning and Zoning satisfactory. <br />PAGE 16 <br />1 <br />1 <br />