Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MEETING <br />AUGUST 22, 1994 <br />block party is proposing to block a portion of a through street. <br />The blocking of through streets was discussed at the August 17, <br />1994 Council work session and the City Engineer was directed to <br />get information from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance <br />Trust (LMCIT) regarding liability in the event that someone was <br />injured on the street during the block party. <br />Mr. Schneider explained that a letter has been received from the <br />loss control attorney at LMCIT stating that it is clear that a <br />City can close a portion of a street for recreational purposes. <br />The letter also states that there is potential liability for the <br />City anytime such an event occurs. The City has to exercise <br />reasonable care to protect both the people who are using the <br />closed off street and the people using the street which leads to <br />the closed off portion. It is important that the City provide <br />adequate barricades to insure the safety of everyone. The letter <br />further states that the City should provide adequate instructions <br />for placing the barricades and monitor the people so that it is <br />done properly. The City may consider having an employee or a <br />Police Reserve member on the scene. If the site of the party is <br />a through street, the City should provide an alternate route for <br />through traffic during the block party. This route should be <br />well marked and this may be a particular issue of the through <br />street is part if an emergency vehicle route. <br />The letter continues by stating that there may also be potential <br />liability if there are any defects in the surface of the street. <br />It is important to inspect the street before granting the permit. <br />If there are any defects, the City should make repairs, place a <br />warning device at the defect or ask the party requesting the <br />permit agree to take on the liability. <br />Although block parties are a good way for bringing a community <br />together. However, anytime the right-of-way is used for that <br />purpose, there may be potential liability for the City. The <br />letter writer suggests investigating any such request to limit <br />the City's liability. <br />Enclosed with the letter were documents that other cities have <br />used to limit the liability during block parties. <br />Mr. Schneider said that the basic suggestion of the LMCIT is that <br />the City be more formal in providing barricades. It will be <br />difficult to place barricades after normal business hours. <br />Therefore, an employee would be called in on an overtime basis to <br />set up the barricades and there would be a cost for doing this. <br />In addition, the forms included with the LMCIT letter require <br />that someone sign off on the liability. Mayor Reinert explained <br />that in the past the City required such a signature. However, <br />PAGE 26 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />