My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/24/1994 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1994
>
10/24/1994 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2015 1:49:52 PM
Creation date
1/20/2015 1:07:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/24/1994
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 24, 1994 <br />jog would mean that the edge of the new blacktop will be only <br />about a foot or two (2) closer to the Zewers home than the <br />present blacktop. This proposal was acceptable to Mr. Zewers, <br />Mr. Connoy and Mr. Goertz. <br />John Thompson, 6125 Baldwin Lake Drive - Mr. Thompson explained <br />that he owns property immediately across the street from the <br />proposed preliminary plat on the west side of Baldwin Lake Road. <br />His concern is in regard to drainage from the plat. A pond is <br />proposed for north of the extension of Woodridge Lane and this <br />pond will drain directly onto his property. Mr. Thompson said <br />that his property is low but never under water unless Rice Creek <br />floods and backs up onto his property. This property is low <br />enough that if the pond overflows, he will have water constantly <br />on his property. This is a horse pasture and if too much water <br />spills onto his property, the property will be cut into two (2) <br />pieces. The horses will not be able to move from the north end <br />to the south end of the property. <br />Mr. Thompson expressed concern about the curbing proposed for <br />Baldwin Lake Road. Drainage from the street will run downhill <br />and when the curbing ends, the water will drain directly onto his <br />property. This means that he will have additional water on his <br />property that was never there before installation of the curbs. <br />Mr. Thompson noted that he has talked to both Mr. Powell and Mr. <br />Goertz about this matter. While both of them seem willing to try <br />to accommodate Mr. Thompson, nobody can satisfactorily tell him <br />what is going to happen to his property. He noted that he was <br />not against the development but like to be assured that he will <br />not end up with future problems and have a lot of water on his <br />property. <br />Mr. Thompson talked to Mr. Goertz today about a county ditch that <br />runs across his property about 300 - 400 feet south of the <br />proposed development. If the runoff from the development could <br />be directed to the county ditch, that would be an acceptable <br />solution. <br />Mr. Powell explained that he has talked to the Rice Creek <br />Watershed District (RCWD) and he and the RCWD are developing an <br />alternative street section for use in the City which would not <br />require curbs on both sides of the street. This would be an <br />ideal area where curb would be constructed on one side of the <br />street and the other side would be like a rural street. Instead <br />of catching the waterflow and directing it to the catch basin, it <br />would let the drainage flow naturally. This would reduce the <br />flow that would be routed through the system. RCWD has some <br />concerns about water quality, but would make sense in this <br />situation. Mr. Powell explained that this system would also be <br />PAGE 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.