Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 1995 <br />Hugo and Lino Lakes, however a great many details regarding <br />implementation and financing of any improvement must be worked <br />out. Mr. Cunningham also referred to the recent letter from the <br />City of Hugo which states that the study is not complete. <br />Mr. Cunningham noted that many times it has been stated that only <br />two (2) phases of the proposed plat are being proposed at this <br />time, however, all phases are necessary to bring about the <br />commercial and industrial growth. Yet the City is still looking <br />at only this one small portion. He felt that is why some people <br />are calling this an island of development. If the other phases <br />do not occur, there will be just this one section and it will not <br />fit into the area. <br />Mr. Cunningham referred to page 11 of the February 13, 1995 <br />minutes in which the White Bear Lake School Superintendent's <br />letter was mentioned. He took exception to this portion of the <br />minutes. The minutes quoted the letter as follows: " it is not <br />the policy of the White Bear School District to look at stoppage <br />of growth as a way of controlling School District problems". Mr. <br />Cunningham felt that the minutes appear to say that the School <br />District is not opposed to or does not want to limit development <br />to control growth. He said that the letter that was written by <br />the Superintendent does not say what was quoted. <br />Mr. Cunningham said he was still concerned about the five (5) <br />criteria for rezoning. The Planning and Zoning Board did not <br />approve the rezone or the preliminary plat. He said that when <br />the rezone and the preliminary plat were presented to the City <br />Council it was passed. Mr. Cunningham listed the five (5) <br />criteria as follows: <br />Consistency to Comprehensive Plan - Mr. Cunningham found no fault <br />with this finding since the MUSA and everything else is there. <br />Compatible With Present and Future Land Use - The Planning and <br />Zoning Board did not feel that this criteria was met. There are <br />no other R-1 areas near the development, it is bordered on the <br />west by a freeway, rural with hobby farms to the south, rural <br />with wetlands to the east and rural and industrial to the north. <br />This subdivision would be a small island with a lot of houses in <br />a rural area. Council Member Bergeson asked that a warning be <br />issued to prospective new home buyers that there are horses in <br />this area. Mr. Cunningham felt that if there is a need for this <br />warning, then it is not compatible with existing uses. Since the <br />proposed plat is bordered on the south and east by hobby farms, <br />problems could occur. <br />Conforms with Performance Standards Within the Zoning Ordinance - <br />PAGE 5 <br />