My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/28/1996 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1996
>
05/28/1996 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2015 12:03:50 PM
Creation date
1/26/2015 2:56:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
05/28/1996
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 28, 1996 <br />Kate Drewry, Administrator for the RCWD, came forward and presented the Council with a map <br />outlining the district they oversee. She indicated that the RCWD was formed in 1972. They <br />manage the overall water resources in the district. She stated that rapid development has caused <br />a dramatic impact on the water area. <br />Ms. Drewry showed a map which outlined Rice Creek, Clearwater Creek, and Hardwood Creek. <br />She gave a brief overview of the six (6) policies of the RCWD. These rules are described in the <br />handout. <br />Ms. Drewry stated that she has worked with the City of Lino Lakes to develop a water <br />management plan and regulatory program. The RCWD does have a five (5) year plan and will <br />be updating their current brochure. <br />Council Member Neal mentioned the cleaning of ditches. He stated that the only complaint he <br />has heard is that ditches are not cleaned. If there is only $15,000 budgeted, it will be difficult to <br />get much done. <br />Steve Worsher, 7131 Gray Heron, came forward and indicated he felt much disappointment <br />regarding Elm Street and the nearby middle school which is under construction. During <br />elections, he had heard many lofty ideas which did not get down to the Council level. He stated <br />that the Wenzel Farms residents were not taken seriously. Residents there wanted Elm Street <br />banned from buses and it did not happen. He stated it is the Council's duty to do more research <br />on important issues like this one. <br />Member Bergeson noted that just because the School Board said so that did not make it so. <br />Mr. Worsher asked why every tree had to be cut down. The School Board had an opportunity to <br />make the property a very unique site. He indicated this was an opportunity for the new City <br />Council and he was very disappointed. <br />Council Member Neal asked how many children Mr. Worsher had in the school. He also asked <br />how many School Board meetings he attended. Mr. Worsher stated that he had one (1) child in <br />the school. He indicated he was not present at any School Board meetings. <br />Council Member Neal stated that Mr. Worsher should have attended the School Board meetings <br />regarding this matter. He asked if Mr. Worsher had contacted any of the Council Members <br />concerning this issue. Mr. Worsher stated that he had not but he was aware that the school <br />district had received about 180 calls on this matter. The School Board knew how the residents of <br />Wenzel Farms felt regarding this issue. <br />Council Member Neal stated that Mr. Worsher should have attended the School Board meetings <br />regarding this matter. The road issue was not the School Board's concern, but the Council's <br />issue. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.