06/24/1996 Council Minutes (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 24, 1996 • The property is approximately .62 acre in size. There are no sewer or water utilities to serve this area. • • The applicant is requesting a minor subdivision to add an 80 foot by 135 foot (Tract B) parcel to the existing 164 foot by 135 foot (Tract A) parcel from an existing 19 acre (Tract C) parcel. Tract B and C are currently zoned rural -executive. Staff originally recommended approval of the minor subdivision to the Planning and Zoning Board with the following conditions: 1. Tract A and B shall be combined to provide one legal description and one tax parcel. 2. No park dedication fee shall be required as no additional structures are proposed to be constructed. 3. The applicant shall apply for a rezoning of Tract B prior to any additional land use applications. (It is the applicants intention to apply for a site plan review in the future to accommodate some site improvements. A rezoning may be appropriate at that time). The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this item at their June 12, 1996 meeting and recommended approval of the minor subdivision with the conditions outlined above. This approval was given prior to discussion with David Licht of NAC and the City Council concerning the upcoming Comprehensive Plan review and update. At the Council work session on June 18, 1996, the Council directed staff to defer future rezoning requests until completion of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, particularly in areas that may be subject to change, i.e.; the Lake Drive corridor. For that reason, staff is recommending that the Council consider a denial of the subdivision request until such time as the Comprehensive Land Use Plan review for this area is complete. The applicant has indicated that he would be interested in obtaining approval of the minor subdivision at this time to allow him to purchase the parcel before the Comprehensive Land Use Plan is adopted. Ms. Wyland read the three (3) option for City Council consideration and added a fourth option as follows: Approve the minor subdivision as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Board with the condition that the parcel remain zoned Rural until the Comprehensive Land Use Plan is completed. Mr. Hawkins noted that it is not unusual for property to have two (2) different zonings. Mr. Carlson, owner of the property, said that there may have been miscommunication regarding this matter. A condition of the sale of the original property (His and Her Barber and Beauty Shop) was that the City approve the property for the operation of a rental business. Mr. Carlson explained his business and noted that some of the rental units will require outside storage. He detailed the area and explained that the previous landowners were concerned that if a developer purchased the balance of the 80 acres, he may want to PAGE 17