Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/12/1996 Council Minutes• • COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 12, 1996 CITY OF LINO LAKES MINUTES DATE : August 12, 1996 TIME STARTED : 6:45 P.M. TIME ENDED : 8:50 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT : Bergeson, Landers, Neal, Kuether and Lyden MEMBERS ABSENT : None Staff members present: City Administrator, Randy Schumacher; City Attorney, Bill Hawkins; Community Development Director, Brian Wessel; City Engineer, David Ahrens; Chief of Police, David Pecchia; and Clerk -Treasurer, Marilyn Anderson SETTING THE AGENDA Council Member Neal requested that Item 5.F., St. Joseph Pedestrian Trail, be moved up on the schedule for discussion at the end of the Open Mike portion of the meeting. Council Member Bergeson requested that comments on the Survey as well as information regarding the City Budget for 1997 be added under "New Business". Mr. Schumacher requested that a disbursement be removed from consideration under the Consent Agenda, namely a Police Department expenditure entitled "United Systems Technology" in the amount of $1,597.50. The Agenda was approved as amended. CONSENT AGENDA Council Member Kuether asked about the July 31 annual disbursements, namely reference to a "'95 Neon". Chief Pecchia explained that the '95 Neon is a vehicle donated to the City by a multiple DUI offender, which is being placed into police service as an unmarked vehicle. The expenditure of $443 is for licensing of the vehicle. Council Member Kuether asked about a disbursement under "Administration" described as "Science Museum of Minnesota Computer Class". Council Member Bergeson explained that a number of computer classes are offered by the Science Museum, and that it is an excellent source of computer training. Council Member Kuether also asked about a $69 expenditure referred to as "University of Nebraska seminar". COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 12, 1996 Council Member Kuether questioned a seminar expenditure labeled "Skill Path, Inc." in the amount of $1,500. Mr. Schumacher and Mr. Wessel indicated that this was a computer class directed at support staff which several City personnel attended, including Mary Alice Divine. Council Member Kuether then questioned an expenditure referred to as "State of Minnesota Department of Transportation Manuals", which Mr. Ahrens explained is an annual fee paid by the City for inclusion in MnDOT manual updates, which are received periodically throughout the year. Council Member Kuether asked about an expenditure under "Government Buildings" referred to as Crawford Door Sales, counter door, in the amount of $1,700. Additionally, she asked about an expenditure referred to as Upper Midwest Sales Company, supplies, in the amount of $480. Mr. Schumacher explained that Upper Midwest provides cleaning supplies for use in maintaining City Hall. Council Member Kuether then questioned an expenditure for a beeper, which Mayor Landers explained was for his use in keeping abreast of his mother's condition as her health failed. He offered to remove this item from the list of disbursements if Council felt it was not appropriate. Council Member Neal expressed his feeling that the Mayor should be allowed that expense. Council Member Kuether also questioned the expenditure for plaques from Letterman Sports. Mr. Schumacher indicated that he would have to check with Mr. Tesch regarding this item. Council Member Kuether then questioned an expenditure under "Parks Department" in the amount of $2,900 to Hugo Feed Mill & Elevator. Council Member Neal pointed out that expenditures over $1,000 should have Council approval. Mr. Schumacher indicated that he would have to check further on this one as well. Council Member Kuether asked about an expenditure for $4,900 to Isanti County Equipment for door repair and equipment. Under "Recreation Department", Council Member Kuether asked about an expenditure referred to as Tom Schelling for golf lessons in the amount of $120. Mr. Schumacher explained that the Recreation Department pays instructors for giving lessons, and is reimbursed through class fees. Council Member Bergeson asked if the items questioned above were recommended for deletion from approved disbursements. Council Member Kuether indicated that she was not suggesting that they not be paid, just that they be explained. Council Member Bergeson moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 2 COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 12, 1996 • ITEM DISBURSEMENTS: July 31, 1996 • ACTION August 12, 1996 (Checks No. 45123 - 45269, $248,940.78) Centennial Fire District August 1, 1996 Installation of Permanent Water Ski Slalom Course on Centerville Lake League of Minnesota Cities Right-of-ways Assessment OPEN MIKE Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved Regarding St. Joseph Catholic Church Trail, Mr. Ahrens explained that on November 27, 1995, Council approved a conditional use permit for St. Joseph's Church that, in part, included the construction of a trail along the north side of Elm Street. This trail will match the trail constructed by the Willow Ponds Development and provide a continuous trail from Sunset Road to Second Avenue on the north side of Elm Street. In March of 1996, Council approved plans for the construction of Centennial Middle School, which includes the construction of a trail along the south side of Elm Street from Lake Drive to Sunrise Drive. Between the two projects mentioned, there will be trails on both sides of Elm Street from Sunrise Drive and Second Avenue. Mr. Ahrens stated that Staff asked St. Joseph Church officials to consider revising their plans to allow for construction of a trail on the south side of Elm Street rather than on the north side. This change would create one trail crossing at Sunrise Drive and Elm Street, and eliminate some duplication in trail work. Initially Staff was under the impression that this suggestion would be received favorably, as trail construction costs could be reduced if the work was shared between the Church and the school district. However, Mr. Ahrens explained that St. Joseph Church officials did not wish to construct a trail on the south side of Elm Street, as it was believed that it would not benefit the Church. Also, it was learned that there was some discussion that the trail on the north side of Elm Street should not be required to be constructed since the school district is constructing a trail on the south side of Elm Street. Mr. Ahrens stated that Council is being asked whether it wants to revise its original motion requiring the construction of a trail on the north side of Elm Street by St. Joseph's Church. COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 12, 1996 Staff recommended that the original motion be maintained requiring construction of a trail on the north side of Elm Street by St. Joseph's Church. Staff has agreed that the two trails are justified, as they both serve a distinct purpose. The trail on the north side of Elm Street serves the church by allowing residents in the Willow Ponds project access to the Church while the trail on the south side of Elm Street serves the school district pedestrian needs and the City's recreational/transportation needs. Council Member Neal questioned benefit to residents of the Willow Pond project. He recommended construction of a trail along the parking lot boundary next to the curb. Mayor Landers asked if the trail would encounter water problems, as the area is low. Mr. Ahrens suggested that design might have to accommodate the area that might be subject to flooding. Mayor Landers asked if the Church would plow a portion of the trail. Mr. Ahrens indicated that plowing would be the City's responsibility. Council Member Lyden expressed concern with designating a trail in a defined parking lot area. Council Member Kuether suggested that all Council members might benefit by visiting the site. Pat Westling of 6930 Lake Drive spoke to Council on behalf of St. Joseph's building committee. She indicated that the Church would rather see the trail constructed on the south side of the road. She explained that a trail on the north side would not benefit the parish, while the trail on the south side would benefit the school. Very few walk to church, and those who come from the senior housing project would probably walk through the woods to the Church property. If the trail is located on the south side of the street, Ms. Westling indicated that the Church does not feel it should be assessed for the improvement. Council Member Kuether asked if the Church would be willing to help the school pay for the trail if it were constructed on the south side of the street. Ms. Westling indicated that she could not speak to that issue. The building committee and the members who handle Church finances would have to review that suggestion. Mayor Landers pointed out that the school has already committed to financial responsibility for a mile of trail on the south side, which would eliminate the need for assessment to the Church. However, Council Member Kuether pointed out that the Willow Pond project portion of the trail is designed to be part of the overall trail system and, if not extended along the north side of the street, will simply end with their portion. Council Member Lyden asked about an existing trail to the Church. Ms. Westling said there is no formal trail, as the development is new. Ms. Westling clarified that the school is paying for the trail starting at Sunrise and going down to Lake Drive, and that a trail on the north side in front of the Church is redundant. 4 • • COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 12, 1996 Council Member Bergeson pointed out that a conditional use permit has already been approved for St. Joseph's Church for a trail on the north side. Therefore, the question is whether or not the City wishes to amend the existing agreement and release the Church from its responsibility in that regard, based upon the contention that such a trail would be redundant. Council Member Neal asked about the cost of St. Joseph's portion of the trail. Mr. Ahrens explained that the total approximate cost should be $8,000. Mr. Ahrens commented that the City has, in the past, approved other church plans, and the churches were required to construct trail sections as part of the overall trail system. Council Members Kuether and Lyden questioned the need for an additional 1,000 feet of trail which would be used by pedestrians traveling from west to east, from a residential area to St. Joseph's Church. Council Member Bergeson pointed out that, in any event, St. Joseph's has not demonstrated willingness to share in the cost of a trail section at all --either on the south or the north side of Elm Street. Council Member Lyden asked if an option could be to construct a partial trail section. Council Member Kuether reiterated that in the event agreement could not be reached to construct the trail on the north side, the cost of placing it on the south side should be shared. Council Member Bergeson suggested that the Church might not be willing to split the cost of the proposed trail section because it would not derive one-half of the benefit from the trail. He asked if it might be possible to negotiate a different percentage to be paid by the Church. Council Member Kuether clarified that agreement had previously been reached that St. Joseph's would pay for construction of the subject trail section, and presently refuse to do so. Therefore, she felt the appropriate solution was for St. Joseph's to assume responsibility for one-half of the cost of the trail. Ms. Westling requested that Council submit this proposal in written form to the Church building committee. Mr. Ahrens agreed to provide an estimate based upon current construction costs. Council Member Kuether moved to accept a 50% share from St. Joseph's Church for the cost of construction of a trail section on the south side of Elm Street in exchange for no trail on the north side. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Council Member Bergeson clarified that this action constitutes an offer to St. Joseph's Church for consideration. Motion carried unanimously. COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 12, 1996 FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, RANDY SCHUMACHER Consideration of Audit Services - Mr. Schumacher explained that the City had requested that the certified public accounting firm of Tautges, Redpath & Company submit a multi-year proposal for auditing services. Council reviewed the firm's three-year proposal at its August 7, 1996 work session, and requested a four- or five-year proposal. Mr. Schumacher stated that he discussed Council's request with Mr. Tautges on August 8, 1996, and that he was agreeable to extending the contract for an additional year (a four-year contract) for the following amounts: Audit year 1996 $19,200 Audit year 1997 $19,800 Audit year 1998 $20,400 Audit year 1999 $21,000 Mr. Schumacher explained that the City would receive a reduction of $2,195 over the term of the contract through extending it by one year. Council Member Bergeson asked about mutual obligation. Mr. Schumacher explained that either party may terminate this agreement upon 30 -days written notice to the other party. Council Member Lyden asked if concrete figures could be negotiated. Further discussion revealed that the present contract basically allows for unforeseen changes in the work load which might require fee adjustment. Council Member Kuether moved to approve the four-year contract with Tautges, Redpath & Company for audit services. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Mr. Schumacher indicated that he would discuss amendment of the contract with Tautges, Redpath & Company pursuant to Council Member Lyden's request. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 93, 1996 Budget Amendment, Contract Adjustments - Mr. Schumacher explained that Resolution No. 96 - 93 proposes amendment of the 1996 General Fund Budget primarily to allow for salary increases. Additionally, increased costs of the Anoka County Assessor, the cost of the air exchanger for the shop, and purchase of cable equipment are taken into consideration in this Resolution. Council Member Bergeson asked Mr. Schumacher to identify increased costs identified as the Anoka County Assessor, the cost of the air exchanger for the shop, and purchase of cable equipment. Mr. Schumacher pointed out that the cost of the air exchanger for the shop is included under "Government Buildings, Capital Outlay", and that purchase of cable equipment appears within the same section, referred to as "Contracted Services". The Anoka County Assessor cost increase appears under "Finance, Contractual Services", which shows an increase of $1,600 over the original budget figure. 6 COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 12, 1996 • Following additional discussion, it was agreed that Ms. Vaske, Director of Finance, should • • provide Council with detailed explanations of the various budget adjustments. Council Member Kuether then asked about accounting for the additional $40,000 in revenue proposed by the amended budget. Mr. Schumacher explained that this would be maintained within a separate account, and used for cable equipment, etc. Mr. Schumacher indicated that the detailed explanation would include a breakout of these figures. Council Member Bergeson moved to adopt Resolution No. 96 - 93, and to request a detailed report from Mr. Schumacher as to salary reserve and cable revenue/expense. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Council Members Kuether and Lyden emphasized the necessity to fully understand the origin of the budget figures. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 96 - 93 can be found at the end of these minutes. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 89 Setting Sale for Issuance of $4,685,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, 1996A - Mr. Schumacher stated that in addition to the written summary provided to Council, Mr. Jerry Shannon of Springsted, Inc. was available to respond to any questions regarding this proposal for sale of general obligation improvement bonds, the proceeds from which would be used to fund the following: 4th Avenue Trunk Utility Improvements Cedar Street Lift Station Trapper's Crossing Street and Utility Improvements Centennial School Street and Utility Improvements Pheasant Hills Preserve, 7th Addition Marshan Lake Condominiums Mr. Shannon addressed Council, reminding the group of his firm's previous capital financing advisory service to the City. He explained that the costs of the above -referenced projects will be assessed in part against benefited properties, with some costs paid through the Area and Unit Fund. In the past the City has issued three-year temporary improvement bonds, which has been a concern of the rating agency. In order to maintain the City's standing for repayment for improvements as they become due, the issue has been structured so that assessments will be spread over a 15 -year period of time so that as property develops there will be significant prepayments of assessments. The bond issue has been structured over a 10 -year period, assuming that assessments will be payable over the 10 -year period. Additionally, Mr. Shannon pointed out that within 5 years the City will be able to call and repay the remainder of the bond issue portion, making for a definitive bond issue. This aggressive payment program provides, COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 12, 1996 among other things, a protection for repayment of a debt within the additional 10 years following the initial payment goal. Mr. Shannon stated that such a program should allow for a better rating for the City. Additionally, the City will be retiring the temporary bonds which come due in November of 1997 a year early, which should also result in a positive rating outlook for the City. Mr. Shannon then described the basis for Resolution No. 96 - 90, which proposes to set the sale for issuance of $3,320,000 general obligation water revenue, 1996B, which is structured over a 15 -year period for the following: Well No. 3 & Pumphouse Water Tower No. 2 Birch Street Trunk Water Improvement Otter Lake Road Trunk Utilities Mr. Shannon explained that such an obligation could be structured over a longer period, but this 15 -year issue has been designed to blend with existing 1990 issue debt. Ideally, the only reason this issue would be called would be if interest rates became significantly better than at present; otherwise, revenues from the water utilities and connection funds would be used to pay the debt service on this particular bond issue. Mr. Shannon indicated that this is the City's first experience under the requirement by the Treasury with regard to secondary market disclosure, which provides for provision of certain information pursuant to future trading among underwriters. On Monday, September 9, bids will be taken in the offices of Springsted, Inc., which will be presented to Council for award at 6:30 that evening. Council Member Bergeson asked why the City entered into temporary bonds in the past. Mr. Shannon explained that temporary bonds provide for maturity in entirety within 3 years. With prepayment of assessments a substantial amount was received to allow for payment within that period with the amount outstanding rolled over into an additional 3 -year temporary financing, which resulted in a 6 -year financing schedule. Almost all of the previous issues were paid within the 6 -year period, providing for the lowest cost financing so far as interest is concerned. Presently that differential is not sufficiently substantial between a B -AA 3 -year issue and a B -AA 10 -year issue. In other words, the interest differential --cost of issuance and refinancing bonds -- now works more to the City's benefit. Exercising call in 5 years now equalizes the cost over the long run. Additionally, previous regulations allowed for earning money on positive fund balances and prepayments of assessments. That is no longer allowed. Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No. 96 - 89, as presented. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 96 - 89 can be found at the end of these minutes. • • • COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 12, 1996 • Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 90 Setting Sale for Issuance of $3,320,000 General Obligation Water Revenue, 1996B • • Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No. 96 - 90, as presented. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 96 - 90 can be found at the end of these minutes. POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAVID PECCHIA Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 86 Accepting Donation from Dead Broke Saddle Club (Community Bike Patrol) - Police Chief Pecchia requested that Council consider acceptance of money donated to Lino Lakes by the Dead Broke Saddle Club to be used toward the expenses of the Bicycle Patrol program. The Club is aware of these expenses, and has donated $1,000 toward the cost of uniforms and equipment. Chief Pecchia added that the purpose of Resolution No. 96 - 86 is to publicly thank the Dead Broke Saddle Club for their generous donation. Council Member Neal moved to adopt Resolution No. 96 - 86, as presented. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 96 - 86 can be found at the end of these minutes. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 88 Authorizing Execution of Agreement for Community Oriented Policing (COPS Grant Program) - Chief Pecchia explained that effective August 1, 1996 to July 31, 1997, the Police Department received a grant in the amount of $16,000 to pay for overtime costs associated with its Bike Patrol, Curfew Sweep, and Neighborhood Watch programs. He stated that Council is being asked to adopt Resolution No. 96 - 88 accepting this grant on behalf of the Lino Lakes and the Lino Lakes Police Department. Council Member Neal moved to adopt Resolution No. 96 - 88, as presented. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 96 - 88 can be found at the end of these minutes. Consideration of Permanent Full-time Employment of Michael Rumpsa as Police Officer - Chief Pecchia explained that as discussed at the recent budget work session and previous Council meetings, the Police Department is requesting Council approval to hire one additional officer as soon as possible. He added that Michael Rumpsa is recommended to fill this position. Mr. Rumpsa owns his own silk screening business and is currently seeking a career change. He completed an internship with the St. Cloud Police Department. His educational background includes a B.A. degree in law enforcement from St. Cloud State University and graduation from Skills at Alexandria Technical College in August of 1993. Chief Pecchia requested authorization for a conditional job offer to Mr. Rumpsa. COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 12,1996 Council Member Neal moved to approve a conditional permanent full-time employment offer to Michael Rumpsa as a Lino Lakes police officer. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT, DAVID AHRENS Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 91 Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids, Centennial Middle School Street and Utility Improvements - Mr. Ahrens reminded Council that it had previously ordered the improvement and preparation of plans and specifications for the Centennial Middle School Street and Utility Improvements. He pointed out that the plans and specifications are now complete, and Council approval is required in order to advertise for bids. By way of background Mr. Ahrens explained that the proposed watermain and sanitary sewer would be extended from the north side of135W south along the 4th Avenue alignment to serve the school project and adjoining properties. The watermain would be looped to the existing watermain in Elm Street to provide adequate water supply. The proposed sanitary sewer is designed to provide service to the school and adjoining properties, including land to the northeast (Town Center area). Service stubs would be installed to adjoining parcels of land to accommodate future development. Additionally, the proposed road is designed for 9 -ton strength with turn and acceleration lanes at the school entrance and along Lake Drive. The road tapers down to a 32 -foot -wide roadway at the west end. Landscaping, including red maple and hackberries, is proposed along Elm Street, as well as berming on the south side of Elm to buffer the road from the residential area on the south. Mr. Ahrens explained that, assuming approval of this project at this time, the balance of the schedule for this project is as follows: Bid Opening Council Awards Contract Construction Begins Substantial Completion September 12, 1996 September 23, 1996 October 7, 1996 July, 1997 Assessments are proposed to properties receiving benefit from these improvements, including the School District, with the City assuming responsibility for oversizing of watermains and sanitary sewer. The Engineer's estimated total cost of this project is $912,000. Council Member Lyden asked what size trees are proposed for the landscaping, and whether or not nearby neighbors have been consulted. Mr. Ahrens indicated that he had not been able to meet with neighbors, but would be willing to do so. He added that a 2-1/2" caliper tree is proposed, which should average approximately 10 feet in height. Boulevard trees are proposed for screening. 10 • • COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 12, 1996 Council Member Bergeson expressed confusion as to why the sanitary sewer is routed under the freeway twice and ultimately to the metro collector. Mr. Ahrens explained that extension from Elm Street was explored; however, the sewer line runs out of sufficient depth to serve the Town Center area. Additionally, the proposed design is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Council Member Neal asked about the traffic signal. Mr. Ahrens indicated that a signal justification report had been submitted to MnDOT in that regard. Council Member Bergeson requested a status report on the traffic signal. Council Member Bergeson moved to adopt Resolution No. 96 - 91, as presented. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 96 - 91 can be found at the end of these minutes. Consideration of Approval of Consulting Engineer Agreement/Transportation Plan - SRF Consulting Group, Inc. - Mr. Ahrens explained that pursuant to Metropolitan Council rules, the City is required to update its Comprehensive Plan, which includes a transportation component. Preliminary work began with the formation of a task force steering committee. Mr. Ahrens stated that Staff interviewed and received a proposal from SRF Consulting Group, Inc. to prepare a transportation plan component for the Comprehensive Plan and to assist the steering committee with transportation issues or questions. Mr. Ahrens presented a draft agreement to Council which outlines the scope of services and basis for payment to SRF. A not -to -exceed amount of $21,500 is included for the transportation plan with additional cost allowance for attendance by SRF representatives at general and public informational meetings as well as special area meetings as they may arise. These additional costs might include $1,000 to $3,000 per study area, as well as $30,000 to $40,000 for the transportation plan, depending upon the number of meetings and special area studies required. Council Member Kuether asked if this expense has been considered in the 1996 and/or 1997 budgets. Mr. Ahrens explained that a portion of the proposed cost would come from the 1996 budget from the consulting and engineering services area, with the balance from the 1997 budget as a specific transportation plan line item. Council Member Bergeson asked if the City takes competitive bids on this type of project. Mr. Ahrens explained that Staff members interviewed a total of 3 firms, and accepted the most competitive bid as well as the most competent agency. Council Member Bergeson expressed concern regarding the high cost suggested for the proposed service. Council Member Kuether asked how the special studies will be ordered. Mr. Ahrens explained that the Comprehensive Plan committee will make these recommendations. • Council Member Kuether asked if efforts in connection with previous studies might be duplicated by the proposed service. Mr. Schumacher indicated that those studies are outdated 11 COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 12, 1996 and specific to land use at interstate intersections. Council Member Kuether recommended that the Comprehensive Plan committee review the previous interchange study. Mr. Wessel indicated that it would be included in background preparations. Council Member Lyden expressed strong exception to expending the proposed amounts of money on the proposed services. Mr. Ahrens stated that analyses required in the overall Plan are exclusive to Lino Lakes, and defraying costs through use of other studies is not a viable alternative. Council Member Bergeson pointed out that a Comprehensive Plan representative agreed to speak to Council prior to that project going forward, and asked if it might be beneficial to have a SRF representative make a similar presentation for Council's enlightenment. Mr. Ahrens stated that SRF would be happy to make such a presentation. Mr. Schumacher added that Staff has possibly acquired an unfair advantage over Council as it has worked closely on the background for this proposal; and he agreed that a presentation would be highly appropriate. Council Member Kuether asked if Lino Lakes has a traffic problem. Mr. Schumacher stated that according to Metropolitan Council, Lino Lakes has a significant transportation problem. Council Member Bergeson moved to table this item until the first Council work session in September. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 92 Accepting Utility Easements and Authorizing Payment, Fourth Avenue Trunk Utility Improvements - Mr. Ahrens explained that on August 14, 1995 Council ordered plans and specifications for the Fourth Avenue Trunk Utility Project. This project includes the construction of sanitary sewer and watermain along Fourth Avenue and Lilac Street to serve the Behm's Century Farms Development. The project, including construction, engineering, and easement acquisition, is proposed to be funded by the Area and Unit Funds to be collected through the Behm's Century Farms Development. The feasibility report for the Fourth Avenue Trunk Utility Improvements estimated easement acquisition to cost $30,000 compared to the $17,925 actual cost. Council Member Lyden moved to adopt Resolution No. 96 - 92, as presented. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 96 - 92 can be found at the end of these minutes. Authorization of Purchase Agreement, Water Storage Tank No. 2 - Mr. Ahrens explained that construction of the City's second water storage tank includes the purchase of land to accommodate the tank. Staff reviewed site alternatives for the construction of the tank and determined that the parcel located west of the realigned Otter Lake Road best meets the City's criteria for siting of the tank. Mr. Richard Schreier, owner of the property, has agreed to sell the 1.03 -acre parcel to the City for $67,500 (45,000 square feet at $1.50 per square foot). This price is based on previous land sales in the area and on the property's General Business zoning 12 • • COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 12, 1996 designation. Mr. Wessel and Mr. Hawkins have reviewed the proposed purchase agreement, which has been determined to be acceptable. Council Member Kuether asked about the amount being paid for land in the Apollo Business Park area. Mr. Wessel explained that the City is paying $.90 per square foot for land being developed in connection with the Apollo Business Park; however, commercial land is less costly than general business. Council Member Bergeson asked if the City has ownership or easement rights to this property. Mr. Ahrens indicated that access has been procured. Council Member Kuether moved to authorize execution of the purchase agreement for Water Storage Tank 2, as presented. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 84 Awarding Construction Contract, Clearwater Creek Development Center Trunk Utilities - Mr. Ahrens stated that bids for this project were opened at 10:00 a.m. on Monday, July 22, 1996 at Lino Lakes City Hall. The bids were received by Council that evening, but the contract award was delayed to allow additional time for acquisition of the necessary easements. Although three parcels remain to be acquired, Mr. Ahrens indicated that the process has reached the point where the contract can be awarded. The low bid from Richard Knutson, Inc., in the amount of $679,747.78, is above the Engineer's Estimate by approximately 4%, which is within the 10% limit allowed by City Charter. This contractor recently completed the Birch Street Trunk Watermain Project for the City, and finished the watermain installation well before the City's completion date. Mr. Ahrens provided Council with correspondence recommending award of this contract to Richard Knutson, Inc., and indicated that Staff recommended approval. Mayor Landers expressed concern that this particular bid had come in higher than the Engineer's Estimate. Council Member Kuether moved to approve the contract award contingent upon completion of the easement acquisition. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. OLD BUSINESS - None. NEW BUSINESS Consideration of Resolution No. 96 - 87 Accepting Donation from Dead Broke Saddle Club (Satisfy Gambling Ordinance Contribution Requirement), Marilyn Anderson - Ms. Anderson explained that the Dead Broke Saddle Club began its nonprofit gambling activity in Lino Lakes at the 49 Club beginning September 1, 1995. The Club has requested renewal of its gambling license, and Council formally approved renewal at its July 22, 1996 meeting. 13 COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 12, 1996 Ms. Anderson pointed out that the Gambling Ordinance requires that all nonprofit gambling organizations donate 10% of their net profits to the benefit of the residents of Lino Lakes. Since the Dead Broke Saddle Club did not donate this 10% directly to the residents of Lino Lakes, it is required to pay the sum of $2,266.73 in cash to the City. This money has been placed in a separate account to be held until Council determines an appropriate legal use for the funds. The purpose of Resolution No. 96 - 87 is to formally thank the Dead Broke Saddle Club for its donation. Council Member Bergeson moved to adopt Resolution No. 96 - 87, as presented. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 96 - 87 can be found at the end of these minutes. Consideration of Minutes, July 22, 1996 (Council Member Lyden was absent) - Council Member Lyden moved to approve the December 8, 1997 Minutes, as submitted. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of Election Judge Appointments, 1996 State Primary and 1996 General Election, Marilyn Anderson - Ms. Anderson presented Council with a list of election judges currently being trained and prepared to carry out the 1996 State primary and general election. If the list is approved by Council, Ms. Anderson indicated that she, with the help of her Chief Judge, determine which precinct each judge will work, carefully considering a balance of Democratic and Republican Judges. Council Member Bergeson pointed out that Mary Joan Doyle no longer resides in Lino Lakes. Ms. Anderson indicated that she had been so advised, and would adjust the list accordingly. Council Member Kuether moved to appoint the 1996 State primary and general election judges as presented, with the exception of Mary Joan Doyle. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried, with Council Member Bergeson abstaining. Survey - Council Member Bergeson raised an issue with Question No. 84, which asks "If the City of Lino Lakes were to attract more development, what kind would you want it to be?", expressing concern that the question is ambiguous. Additionally, he felt that the Charter question, initially asking about starting a road fund and revised to be extremely detailed, should be rewritten for ease of reading. Council Member Kuether suggested that questions such as the Charter question, which are extremely technical in nature, may have to be broken down into more than one issue. Council Member Bergeson added that interchanging word tenses within the Survey creates confusion. 14 • • COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 12,1996 1997 Budget - Council Member Bergeson explained that the question had been raised at a recent Council work session as to whether money from the closed bond fund could be used for the current operating fund. He indicated that the answer to this question is included in the management letter accompanying the City's audit letter, which suggests certain ratios to be met prior to removing any money from a bond fund. Consideration of a Block Party Request, Red Hawk Trail Cul-de-sac, Marilyn Anderson - Ms. Anderson presented this request to hold a block party in the cul-de-sac at the end of Red Hawk Trail. A map was provided showing the precise location of the proposed block party, which is planned for August 24, 1996 from 2:30 p.m. until 10:00 p.m. Ms. Anderson added that the Police Department and the Public Works Department have been given information regarding the party. The Public Works Department will provide barricades to block the cul-de-sac, and a Police patrol car will visit the site while the party is in progress. Ms. Anderson recommended approval of this request. Council Member Neal moved to approve the block party request for Red Hawk Trail cul-de-sac, as presented. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Glenview Avenue Signs - Council Member Neal questioned placement of "no parking" signs on Glenview Avenue. Mr. Schumacher explained that a Public Works employee cannot unilaterally place signs; Council must approve such activity. Mr. Ahrens stated that there is a sight -line problem in that vicinity, and feels that the signs are justified. He added that he would prepare a report for presentation to Council at its next work session. ADJOURN Council Member Neal moved to adjourn at 8:50 p.m. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council a eeting on June 22, 1998. AJAALLI Mar lyn Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer Kim'. y A. : ul Ivan, Mayor • Transcribed by: Judy Pope TimeSaver Off -Site Secretarial, Inc. 15 Council Member Kuether resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-84 introduced the following RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS FOR CLEARWATER CREEK TRUNK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, Pursuant to an Advertisement for Bids for Clearwater Creek Trunk Utility Improvements, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Name and Address Amount of Bid Richard Knutson, Inc. 12585 Rhode Island Avenue South Savage, Minnesota 55378 Brown and Chris, Inc. East Frontage Road of 1-35 19740 Kenrick Avenue Lakeville, Minnesota 55044 $679,747.78 $696,667.44 Northdale Construction $698,490.78 14450 Northdale Blvd Rogers, Minnesota 55374 Arcon Construction $765,867.37 P. O. Box 57 Mora, Minnesota 55051 Lametti and Sons, Inc. $788,673.00 16028 Forest Blvd North P. O. Box 375 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 S.R. Weidema, Inc. 17600 113th Avenue North Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369 $832,682.19 Engineer's Estimate $653,459.50 • • • AND WHEREAS, it appears that Richard Knutson, Inc., Savage, Minnesota, is the lowest responsible bidder, • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: • • 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract with Richard Knutson, Inc. of Savage, Minnesota, in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the Clearwater Creek Trunk Utility Improvements, according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of August, •Ts 6./ -41 Jo ► L. Landers, a or Y MarilyndG. Anderson Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Lyden and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers. The following voted against same: none. Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on August 12 , 1996. L171 - Marilyn t/ Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer Council Member Neal introduced the following resolution • and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96 - 86 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM THE DEAD BROKE SADDLE CLUB FOR - THE BICYCLE PATROL PROGRAM WHEREAS, special uniforms and equipment are needed for a bicycle patrol program; and WHEREAS, funding for these expenses were not included in the Police Department budget; and WHEREAS, the Dead Broke Saddle Club has made a donation in the amount of $1000.00 to the City of Lino Lakes for the cost of uniforms and needed equipment to initiate the Bicycle Patrol program; and WHEREAS, the monies will be appropriated to the General Fund in the following manner: Increase Revenue - Contributions Increase Expenditures -Police Uniforms $1000.00 $1000.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Lino Lakes hereby accepts the donation of $1000.00 for the cost of uniforms and equipment and wishes to express its gratitude to the Dead Broke Saddle Club for its donation. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of August, 1996. Marilyn Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer J%6hn Landers, Mayor • The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Lyden and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Kuether, Neal, Lyden, Landers. The following voted against same: none. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • • • Council Member Bergeson adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96 - 87 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM THE DEAD BROKE SADDLE CLUB WHEREAS: the Lino Lakes Gambling Code, Section 611.03, requires; "during any year that an eligible organization is licensed to conduct gambling events, not less than ten (10%) percent of the net profits from the operation of the gambling by charitable organizations shall be used annually for charitable purposes directly benefiting residents of the City of Lino Lakes", and WHEREAS, the Dead Broke Saddle Club was made aware of the Gambling Code requirement and wishes to donate a portion of their requirement directly to benefit certain residents of the City and to donate the balance of the requirement, $2,266.73 in cash to the City for distribution by the City to benefit citizens of Lino Lakes, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Lino Lakes hereby accepts the donation of $2,266.73 and will designate its use at a later date. The City of Lino Lakes wishes to express its gratitude to the Dead Broke Saddle Club for its donation. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of August, 1996. Matil n /cLh41 Clerk-Treasurer Y L. Landers, Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Neal and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favorthereof: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers The following voted against same: none. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Member Neal introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96 - .88 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Lino Lakes enter into a cooperative agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety for the project entitled. Community -Oriented Policing (COPS) Grant Program, Overtime, during the period from August 1, 1996 through July 31, 1997. Mayor, John L. Landers and Clerk -Treasurer, Marilyn G. Anderson are hereby authorized to execute such agreements and amendments, as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the City of Lino Lakes. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of August, 1996. ATTEST: Marilyn n, Clerk -Treasurer G. derso L. Landers, Mayor The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Lyden upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers. The following voted against same: None. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on August 12, 1996. Marlyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer ti • • • • • • Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, was held at the City Hall in the City on Monday, August 12, 1996, commencing at 6:30 o'clock p.M. The following members of the Council were present: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers. and the following were absent: none. * * * The following resolution was presented by Councilmember Kuether moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 96-89 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $4,685,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1996A , who BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota (City) as follows: 1. It is hereby determined that: (a) the following assessable public improvements (the Improvements) have been made, duly ordered or contracts let for the construction thereof, by the City pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 (Act); DJK108525 LN140-51 4th Avenue Trunk Utilities Cedar Street Lift Station Trapper's Crossing Centennial School Pheasant Hills 7th Addition Marshan Condos 500,000 400,000 950,000 1,600,000 400,000 750,000 Subtotal 4,600,000 Less Investment Earnings Total Series 1996A Bonds 3,389 2,711 6,438 10,843 2,711 5,083 31,175 6,078 4,863 11,549 19,450 4,863 9,117 55,920 509,467 407.573 967,987 1,630,294 407,573 764.200 4,687,095 ( 2,095) 4,685,000 (b) it is necessary and expedient to the sound financial management of the affairs of the City to issue $4,685,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1996A (Bonds) pursuant to the Act to provide financing for the Improvements. 2. To provide financing for the Improvements, the City will issue and sell Bonds in the amount of $4,629,080. To provide in part the additional interest required to market the Bonds at this time, additional Bonds will be issued in the amount of $55,920. The excess of the purchase price of the Bonds over the sum of $4,629,080 will be credited to the debt service fund for the Bonds for the purpose of paying interest first coming due on the additional Bonds. The Bonds will be issued, sold and delivered in accordance with the terms of the following Terms of Proposal: DJR108525 LN140-51 Project Project Costs Bond Issuance Costs Under - writer's Discount Total 4th Avenue Trunk Utilities Cedar Street Lift Station Trapper's Crossing Centennial School Pheasant Hills 7th Addition Marshan Condos 500,000 400,000 950,000 1,600,000 400,000 750,000 Subtotal 4,600,000 Less Investment Earnings Total Series 1996A Bonds 3,389 2,711 6,438 10,843 2,711 5,083 31,175 6,078 4,863 11,549 19,450 4,863 9,117 55,920 509,467 407.573 967,987 1,630,294 407,573 764.200 4,687,095 ( 2,095) 4,685,000 (b) it is necessary and expedient to the sound financial management of the affairs of the City to issue $4,685,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1996A (Bonds) pursuant to the Act to provide financing for the Improvements. 2. To provide financing for the Improvements, the City will issue and sell Bonds in the amount of $4,629,080. To provide in part the additional interest required to market the Bonds at this time, additional Bonds will be issued in the amount of $55,920. The excess of the purchase price of the Bonds over the sum of $4,629,080 will be credited to the debt service fund for the Bonds for the purpose of paying interest first coming due on the additional Bonds. The Bonds will be issued, sold and delivered in accordance with the terms of the following Terms of Proposal: DJR108525 LN140-51 • • THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS: TERMS OF PROPOSAL $4,685,000 CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1996A (BOOK ENTRY ONLY) Proposals for the Bonds will be received on Monday, September 9, 1996, until 12:00 Noon, Central Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at 6:30 P.M., Central Time, of the same day. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Proposals may be submitted in a sealed envelope or by fax (612) 223-3002 to Springsted. Signed Proposals, without final price or coupons, may be submitted to Springsted prior to the time of sale. The bidder shall be responsible for submitting to Springsted the final Proposal price and coupons, by telephone (612) 223-3000 or fax (612) 223-3002 for inclusion in the submitted Proposal. Springsted will assume no liability for the inability of the bidder to reach Springsted prior to the time of sale specified above. Proposals may also be filed electronically via PARITY, in accordance with PARITY Rules of Participation and the Terms of Proposal, within a one-hour period prior to the time of sale established above, but no Proposals will be received after that time. If provisions in the Terms of Proposal conflict with the PARITY Rules of Participation, the Terms of Proposal shall control. The normal fee for use of PARITY may be obtained from PARITY and such fee shall be the responsibility of the bidder. For further information about PARITY, potential bidders may contact PARITY at 100 116th Avenue SE, Suite 100, Bellevue, Washington 98004, telephone (206) 635-3545. Neither the City nor Springsted Incorporated assumes any liability if there is a malfunction of PARITY. All bidders are advised that each Proposal shall be deemed to constitute a contract between the bidder and the City to purchase the Bonds regardless of the manner of the Proposal submitted. DETAILS OF THE BONDS The Bonds will be dated October 1, 1996, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing August 1, 1997. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months. The Bonds will mature February 1 in the years and amounts as follows: 1998 $300,000 1999 $625,000 2000 $600,000 2001 $595,000 2002 $590,000 2003 $405,000 2004 $400,000 2006 $390,000 2005 $395,000 2007 $385,000 BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bond, representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ("DTC"), New York, New York, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual purchases of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof of a single maturity through book entries made on the books and records of DTC and its participants. Principal and interest are payable by the registrar to DTC or its nominee as registered owner of the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of DTC will be the responsibility of DTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of beneficial owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be required to deposit the Bonds with DTC. REGISTRAR The City will name the registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will pay for the services of the registrar. OPTIONAL REDEMPTION The City may elect on February 1, 2002, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or after February 1, 2003. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part at the option of the City and in such manner as the City shall determine. If Tess than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify DTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest. SECURITY AND PURPOSE The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City will pledge special assessments against benefited property. The proceeds will be used to finance public improvements within the City. TYPE OF PROPOSALS ' Proposals shall be for not Tess than $4,628,780 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the Bonds. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ("Deposit") in the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $46,850, payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany each proposal. If a Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond must identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is required to submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit requirement. The City will deposit the check of the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement and no interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1 %. Rates must be in ascending order. Bonds of the same maturity shall bear a single • rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No conditional proposals will be accepted. AWARD The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in accordance with customary practice, will be controlling. The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non -substantive informalities of any proposal or of matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all proposals without cause, and, (iii) reject any proposal which the City determines to have failed to comply with the terms herein. -BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION If the Bonds qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of the Bonds. Any increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser. Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on the Bonds. CUSIP NUMBERS If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the purchaser. SETTLEMENT Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the City and the purchaser. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and of customary closing papers, including a no -litigation certificate. On the date of settlement payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds which shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon, Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds shall have been made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for any Toss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non-compliance with said terms for payment. CONTINUING DISCLOSURE In accordance with SEC Rule 15c2 -12(b)(5), the City will undertake, pursuant to the resolution awarding sale of the Bonds, to provide annual reports and notices of certain events. A • description of this undertaking is set forth in the Official Statement. The purchaser's obligation to purchase the Bonds will be conditioned upon receiving evidence of this undertaking at or prior to delivery of the Bonds. OFFICIAL STATEMENT The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent information relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly -final Official Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (612) 223-3000. The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2-12. By awarding the Bonds to any underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 185 copies of the Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent for purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby that if its proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall enter into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement. Dated August 12, 1996 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ Marilyn Anderson Clerk - iv - • • • • 3. Springsted Incorporated is authorized and directed to negotiate the Bonds in accordance with the foregoing Terms of Proposal. The City Council will meet at 6:30 o'clock P.M. on Monday, September 9, 1996, to consider proposals on the Bonds and take any other appropriate action with respect to the Bonds. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Lyden , and upon vote being taken thereon the following members voted in favor of the motion: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers. and the following voted against: none. whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, was held at the City Hall in the City on Monday, August 12, 1996, commencing at 6:30 o'clock P.M. The following members of the Council were present: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers_. and the following were absent: none. *** The following resolution was presented by Councilmember Kuether moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 96-90 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $3,320,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION WATER REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1996B who BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota (City) as follows: 1. It is determined that: (a) the City engineer has recommended the construction of various improvements to the City's water system (Project) . (b) the City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075 (Act) to finance all or a portion of the cost of the Project (Project Costs) by the issuance of general obligation bonds of the City payable from the net revenues of the water system. The Project Costs are presently estimated by the engineer to be as follows: Project Costs: Well No. 3 Pumphouse Tower No. 2 Birch Street Trunk Water Otter Lake Road Trunk Utilities Total Project Costs Insurance Costs DJK108529 LN140-51 $ 500,000 1,200,000 750,000 800,000 $3,250,000 25,250 • • Allowance for Discount Bidding 44,750 Total Series 1996 B Bonds $3, 320, 000 (c) it is necessary and expedient to the sound financial management of the affairs of the City to issue $3,320,000 General Obligation Water Revenue Bonds, Series 1996B (Bonds) pursuant to the Act to provide financing for the Project. • • 2. In order to provide financing for the Project, the City will therefore issue and sell Bonds in the amount of $3,275,250. To provide in part the additional interest required to market the Bonds at this time, additional Bonds will be issued in the amount of $44,750. The excess of the purchase price of the Bonds over the sum of $3,275,250 will be credited to the debt service fund for the Bonds for the purpose of paying interest first coming due on the additional Bonds. The Bonds will be issued, sold and delivered in accordance with the terms of the following Terms of Proposal: DJK108529 LN140-51 THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS: TERMS OF PROPOSAL $3,320,000 CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION WATER REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1996B (BOOK ENTRY ONLY) Proposals for the Bonds will be received on Monday, September 9, 1996, until 12:00 Noon, Central Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at 6:30 P.M., Central Time, of the same day. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Proposals may be submitted in a sealed envelope or by fax (612) 223-3002 to Springsted. Signed Proposals, without final price or coupons, may be submitted to Springsted prior to the time of sale. The bidder shall be responsible for submitting to Springsted the final Proposal price and coupons, by telephone (612) 223-3000 or fax (612) 223-3002 for inclusion in the submitted Proposal. Springsted will assume no liability for the inability of the bidder to reach Springsted prior to the time of sale specified above. Proposals may also be filed electronically via PARITY, in accordance with PARITY Rules of Participation and the Terms of Proposal, within a one-hour period prior to the time of sale established above, but no Proposals will be received after that time. If provisions in the Terms of Proposal conflict with the PARITY Rules of Participation, the Terms of Proposal shall control. The normal fee for use of PARITY may be obtained from PARITY and such fee shall be the responsibility of the bidder. For further information about PARITY, potential bidders may contact PARITY at 100 116th Avenue SE, Suite 100, Bellevue, Washington 98004, telephone (206) 635-3545. Neither the City nor Springsted Incorporated assumes any liability if there is a malfunction of PARITY. All bidders are advised that each Proposal shall be deemed to constitute a contract between the bidder and the City to purchase the Bonds regardless of the manner of the Proposal submitted. DETAILS OF THE BONDS The Bonds will be dated October 1, 1996, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing August 1, 1997. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months. The Bonds will mature February 1 in the years and amounts as follows: 1998 $ 85,000 1999 $150,000 2000 $145,000 2001 $155,000 2002 $160,000 2003 $165,000 2004 $175,000 2005 $185,000 -i- 2006 $190,000 2007 $200,000 2008 $210,000 2009 $345,000 2010 $365,000 2011 $385,000 2012 $405,000 • • • BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bond, representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ("DTC"), New York, New York, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual purchases of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof of a single maturity through book entries made on the books and records of DTC and its participants. Principal and interest are payable by the registrar to DTC or its nominee as registered owner of the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of DTC will be the responsibility of DTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of beneficial owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be required to deposit the Bonds with DTC. REGISTRAR The City will name the registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will pay for the services of the registrar. OPTIONAL REDEMPTION The City may elect on February 1, 2007, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or after February 1, 2008. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part at the option of the City and in such manner as the City shall determine. If Tess than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify DTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest. SECURITY AND PURPOSE The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City will pledge net revenues of its water utility. The proceeds will be used to finance improvements to the City's water system. TYPE OF PROPOSALS Proposals shall be for not less than $3,275,250 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the Bonds. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ("Deposit") in the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $33,200, payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany each proposal. If a Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond must identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is required to submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit requirement. • The City will deposit the check of the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement and no interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1%. Rates must be in ascending order. Bonds of the same maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No conditional proposals will be accepted. AWARD The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in accordance with customary practice, will be controlling. The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non -substantive informalities of any proposal or of matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all proposals without cause, and, (iii) reject any proposal which the City determines to have failed to comply with the terms herein. BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION If the Bonds qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of the Bonds. Any increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser. Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on the Bonds. CUSIP NUMBERS If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the purchaser. SETTLEMENT Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the City and the purchaser. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and of customary closing papers, including a no -litigation certificate. On the date of settlement payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds which shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon, Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds shall have been made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non-compliance with said terms for payment. CONTINUING DISCLOSURE • In accordance with SEC Rule 15c2 -12(b)(5), the City will undertake, pursuant to the resolution awarding sale of the Bonds, to provide annual reports and notices of certain events. A description of this undertaking is set forth in the Official Statement. The purchaser's obligation to purchase the Bonds will be conditioned upon receiving evidence of this undertaking at or prior to delivery of the Bonds. • • OFFICIAL STATEMENT The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent information relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly -final Official Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any prospective purchaser -is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (612) 223-3000. The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2-12. By awarding the Bonds to any underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 130 copies of the Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent for purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby that if its proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall enter into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement. Dated August 12, 1996 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL iv - /s/ Marilyn Anderson Clerk 3. Springsted Incorporated is authorized and directed to negotiate the Bonds in accordance with the foregoing Terms of Proposal. The City Council will meet at 6:30 o'clock P.M. on Monday, September 9, 1996, to consider proposals on the Bonds and take other appropriate action with respect to the Bonds. 4. In the resolution awarding the sale of the Bonds the City Council will set forth the covenants and undertakings required by the Act. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Bergeson , and upon vote being taken thereon the following members voted in favor of the motion: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers. and the following voted against: none. whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. DJR109529 711140-51 • • • Council Member Bergeson introduced the following resolution and moved its • adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-91 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS - CENTENNIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council passed by the council on May 12, 1996, OSM, Inc., has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of Centennial Middle School Street and Utility Improvements and has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made part • hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin and advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for three weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the Clerk until 10 a.m. on Thursday, September 12, 1996, at which time they will be publicly opened in the Council Chambers of the City Hall by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, September 23, 1996, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the Clerk for five (5) percent of the amount of such bid. • Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of August, 1996. L. Landers, Mayor Marilyn/1rnderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Neal and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers. The following voted against same: none. Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on August 12, 1996. -41 671, A2A Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer • • • • • • Council Member Lyden introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-92 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING UTILITY EASEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT - FOURTH AVENUE TRUNK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council passed by the council on January 22, 1996, the Fourth Avenue Trunk Utility Improvement was ordered; and, WHEREAS, utility easements are needed to construct the Fourth Avenue Trunk Utility Improvement; and, WHEREAS, property owners along said improvement have agreed to execute a Permanent Easement that will accommodate the Fourth. Avenue Trunk Utility Improvement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. To approve the Utility Easements with the property owners listed on Exhibit A. 2. To authorize the payment for said easements to the property owners in the amount listed on Exhibit A. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of August, 1996. i, ai,6„, Marilyn . Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer L. Landers, Mayor The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Kuether and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers. The following voted against same: none. Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on August 12, 1996. . Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer Council member Bergeson introduced the following • resolution and move its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 96-93 RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1996 GENERAL FUND BUDGET WHEREAS, the General Fund budget should be amended to reflect 1996 salary increases (union and non-union positions) adopted by the City Council, and WHEREAS, the General Fund Budget should be amended for the increase in charges for the Anoka County Assessor, and WHEREAS, the General Fund Budget should be amended for an air exchanger in the shop. WHEREAS, the General Fund Budget should be amended to reflect revenues received for the purchase of cable equipment. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the following budget amendment be authorized (see attached schedule): Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes this 12th day of August, 1996. L�/YI/ Marilyn G. nderson, Clerk Treasurer 7 n Landers - Mayor • The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Kuether and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson. Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers. The following voted against same: none . Where upon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted: • • • City of Lino Lakes 1996 Budget Adjustments Amended Budget Budget Difference Administration (412) (0101) Salaries 190,315 196,025 5,710 (0121) PERA 8,580 8,830 250 (0122) FICA 14,870 15,300 430 (0151) Worker's Compensation 1,330 1,370 40 Total 6,430 Finance (403) (0101) Salaries 103,330 106,430 3,100 (0121) PERA 4,660 4,790 130 (0122) FICA 8,100 8,340 240 (0151) Worker's Compensation 720 740 20 (0400) Contractual Services 46,000 47,600 1,600 Total 5,090 Economic Development (402) (0101) Salaries 90,140 92,840 2,700 (0121) PERA 4,040 4,160 120 (0122) FICA 6,900 7,100 200 (0151) Worker's Compensation 1,760 1,810 50 Total 3,070 Engineering/Planning (416) (0101) Salaries 141,080 145,800 4,720 (0121) PERA 6,320 6,540 220 (0122) FICA 10,800 11,160 360 (0151) Worker's Compensation 2,130 2,200 70 Total 5,370 Government Buildings (418) (0101) Salaries 21,300 0 -21,300 (0121) PERA 1,090 0 -1,090 (0122) FICA 2,130 0 -2,130 (0131) Health Insurance 4,020 0 -4,020 (0133) Life Insurance 100 0 -100 (0151) Worker's Compensation 2,420 0 -2,420 (0400) Contracted Services 0 24,000 24,000 (0500) Capital Outlay 10,700 14,700 4,000 Total -3,060 8/9/96 City of Lino Lakes 1996 Budget Adjustments Amended Budget Budget Difference Police Department (420) (0101) Salaries 685,500 676,370 -9,130 (0121) PERA 75,910 74,740 -1,170 (0122) FICA 12,740 12,360 -380 (0131) Health Insurance 62,040 63,470 1,430 (0133) Life Insurance 1,700 1,900 200 (0151) Worker's Compensation 36,180 36,040 -140 Total -9,190 Building Inspections (422) (0101) Salaries 80,430 82,850 2,420 (0121) PERA 3,630 3,740 110 (0122) FICA 6,200 6,380 180 (0151) Worker's Compensation 1,510 1,550 40 Total 2,750 Streets (430) (0101) Salaries 163,720 157,280 -6,440 (0121) PERA 7,900 7,610 -290 (0122) FICA 14,350 13,850 -500 (0131) Health Insurance 19,380 18,290 -1,090 (0133) Life Insurance 500 460 -40 (0151) Worker's Compensation 13,860 13,370 -490 Total -8,850 Solid Waste (431) (0101) Salaries 20,910 21,530 620 (0121) PERA 1,020 1,040 20 (0122) FICA 1,890 1,930 40 (0151) Worker's Compensation 170 170 0 Total 680 Fleet Management (432) (0101) Salaries 40,860 41,070 210 (0121) PERA 1,860 1,870 10 (0122) FICA 3,180 3,190 10 (0151) Worker's Compensation 2,980 2,990 10 Total 240 Parks (450) (0101) Salaries 137,060 139,230 2,170 (0106) Other Salaries 28,720 29,010 290 (0121) PERA 6,740 6,850 110 (0122) FICA 12,920 13,100 180 (0151) Worker's Compensation 5,910 5,980 70 Total 2,820 Recreation (451) (0101) Salaries 34,950 36,000 1,050 8/9/96 • City of Lino Lakes 1996 Budget Adjustments • (0121) PERA (0122) FICA (0151) Worker's Compensation Total Forestry (453) (0101) Salaries (0121) PERA (0122) FICA (0151) Worker's Compensation Total Grand Total Amended Budget Budget Difference 2,260 4,170 2,340 33,910 1,550 2,640 1,470 2,310 4,250 2,390 33,910 1,550 2,640 1,470 50 80 50 1,230 0 0 0 0 0 6,580 (3730-101) Cable TV Revenues 28,000 48,000 20,000 (0500) Cable TV 4,000 24,000 20,000 • • 8/9/96