Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 12, 1996 <br />Council Member Bergeson pointed out that a conditional use permit has already been approved <br />for St. Joseph's Church for a trail on the north side. Therefore, the question is whether or not the <br />City wishes to amend the existing agreement and release the Church from its responsibility in <br />that regard, based upon the contention that such a trail would be redundant. <br />Council Member Neal asked about the cost of St. Joseph's portion of the trail. Mr. Ahrens <br />explained that the total approximate cost should be $8,000. <br />Mr. Ahrens commented that the City has, in the past, approved other church plans, and the <br />churches were required to construct trail sections as part of the overall trail system. <br />Council Members Kuether and Lyden questioned the need for an additional 1,000 feet of trail <br />which would be used by pedestrians traveling from west to east, from a residential area to St. <br />Joseph's Church. <br />Council Member Bergeson pointed out that, in any event, St. Joseph's has not demonstrated <br />willingness to share in the cost of a trail section at all --either on the south or the north side of <br />Elm Street. <br />Council Member Lyden asked if an option could be to construct a partial trail section. Council <br />Member Kuether reiterated that in the event agreement could not be reached to construct the trail <br />on the north side, the cost of placing it on the south side should be shared. <br />Council Member Bergeson suggested that the Church might not be willing to split the cost of the <br />proposed trail section because it would not derive one-half of the benefit from the trail. He asked <br />if it might be possible to negotiate a different percentage to be paid by the Church. <br />Council Member Kuether clarified that agreement had previously been reached that St. Joseph's <br />would pay for construction of the subject trail section, and presently refuse to do so. Therefore, <br />she felt the appropriate solution was for St. Joseph's to assume responsibility for one-half of the <br />cost of the trail. <br />Ms. Westling requested that Council submit this proposal in written form to the Church building <br />committee. Mr. Ahrens agreed to provide an estimate based upon current construction costs. <br />Council Member Kuether moved to accept a 50% share from St. Joseph's Church for the cost of <br />construction of a trail section on the south side of Elm Street in exchange for no trail on the north <br />side. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. <br />Council Member Bergeson clarified that this action constitutes an offer to St. Joseph's Church <br />for consideration. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />