Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 20, 1996 <br />Mr. Fredrickson asked how old the worst streets are. Mr. Ahrens estimated they are 15 to 20 <br />years old and the life expectancy is 20 to 25 years. <br />Mr. Fredrickson stated he believes haulers can meet most of the City's goals, can reduce impact <br />to streets by offering a recycling program that is every other week, and may be able to reduce <br />traffic by going to hauling two days a week. He suggested residents be encouraged to use <br />compost sites so haulers do not need to pick up leaves or Christmas trees. Mr. Fredrickson stated <br />he would like the opportunity to compete in cities that have organized collection. <br />Kim Carlson, BFI, stated there is a State of Minnesota video tape regarding wear and tear on <br />roads but it appears the engineers have indicated that if you build a road in Minnesota and don't <br />make any repairs to it, it will still need to be replaced in 20 years. She suggested that perception <br />and reality are two different things, especially when you are asking residents to give up selection <br />and going to a single hauler process. She asked if this offers a competitive system and stated she <br />does not believe it does but allows haulers and consortiums to run the show, instead of the <br />residents. Ms. Carlson asked who will capitalize the expenses to get into this process. She urged <br />the Council to forget about organized collection and leave it as a competitive process. Ms. <br />Carlson stated it would also allow residents to compare prices and get rid of a hauler when there <br />is a problem. She asserted if a price comparison is done, there isn't much of a difference between <br />organized collection and free enterprise. She reviewed statistics from another city that did an <br />evaluation and found there was only a difference of $1.34. Ms. Carlson stated the best price is <br />always gained where there is competition. She stated she understands the concern about funding <br />road repairs. Ms. Carlson stated she assumed this would be more of a consortium organized <br />collection where the same haulers would be involved and the area divided out according to the <br />number of households they currently pick up. However, the City is talking about a bidding <br />process. She suggested the attorney be asked for a legal opinion about the City's liability issues <br />for a taking. Ms. Carlson thanked the Council for this opportunity to speak to these issues. <br />Council Member Neal stated he has enjoyed Ms. Carlson's comments. <br />Jeff Glewe, United Waste, congratulated the citizens of Lino Lakes on the good turnout for this <br />meeting. He explained the reason for the meeting was due to the Council's intent to organize <br />collection in March. Mr. Glewe stated that most haulers are not in favor or organized collection <br />because they are in a competitive business and organized hauling is a non-competitive situation. <br />He reviewed the stated goals as established to limit truck traffic on residential streets, uniform <br />day for collection on same day, expanded recycling program for curbside and add additional <br />materials, and limit hours of operation. Mr. Glewe stated for the most part the haulers do an <br />excellent job in meeting these goals and getting into and out of the City in a short period of time. <br />Brian Fronczak, Waste Management, stated other haulers have stated the hauler's concerns. He <br />stated they are all against organized collection and are able to address concerns the City has. He <br />asked why other cities have considered organized collection but declined. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS/QUESTIONS <br />Council Member Bergeson pointed out that not all streets involved are City streets, a number are <br />State and County roads. He explained that most are aware that Lino Lakes is a Home Rule <br />PAGE 5 <br />