Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 11, 1997 <br />road surface to approximately 25 feet onto each property in this area. It is estimated that <br />approximately 50 trees will need to be cleared and utility easements will be required. Staff will <br />contact these property owners to discuss the possibility of installing the sanitary sewer on the <br />west side of Lake Drive. <br />Council ordered the preparation of a feasibility report for extending trunk utilities on Lake Drive <br />from 79th Street to Main Street at its July 28, 1997 meeting. The report is not complete at this <br />time. This report can be treated as a separate project for Council's consideration to be <br />incorporated into the original project at the time of actual construction, and it is Staffs collective <br />opinion that it is not necessary to continue the public hearing until the report is complete. A <br />separate hearing will be scheduled for those property owners effected by this proposal and can be <br />ordered to be included with the trunk utility project from Lilac Street to 79th Street. <br />Staff has checked City Hall records for any previous proposal to extend trunk utilities along Lake <br />Drive. Unfortunately, Staff has not been able to locate any files with respect to such a proposal <br />within the past 5 or 6 years. Staff is aware of a project proposed 15 to 20 years ago, but was <br />unable to locate detailed information. <br />Mayor Landers opened the public hearing continuation at 6:48 P.M. <br />John Varrone, 7782 Lake Drive, stated that he has lived in Lino Lakes for 11 years, and was here <br />at least 3 or 4 years when a previous proposal for sewer and water on Lake Drive was considered. <br />He stated that information should exist as to work performed at that time and as to related costs. <br />Mr. Varrone then explained that at the time of the previous investigation his property was <br />included within MUSA boundaries. According to Mr. Varrone, installation of sewer and water <br />lines up Lake Drive was suggested but that it was more cost-effective to run lines along the west <br />side of Lake Drive. Mr. Varrone stated that at that time his property was redesignated as being <br />outside MUSA boundaries. He stated that he received a written proposed assessment at that time <br />of $29,000, followed shortly by the Bisel Amendment reducing that assessment amount. He <br />reiterated that he is not opposed to the present proposed improvement project, but that he <br />disagrees with the City paying for additional investigative work. Mr. Varrone then stated that <br />regardless of the route determined for the new lines, laterals should be installed at the same time <br />to service both sides of the street. He expressed concern that his questions remain unanswered. <br />Council Member Neal asked Mr. Ahrens if all residents along Lake Drive had been sent a letter <br />notifying them of the proceedings with respect to this project. Mr. Ahrens explained that the <br />notification area included the area from the Lilac Street intersection north to 79th Street. Council <br />Member Neal stated that the residents of 7631 Lake Drive did not receive notification. <br />With respect to Mr. Varrone's reference to installation of laterals at the time of the initial <br />construction, Mr. Ahrens explained that the City has the option to order this project including <br />installation of laterals with the new trunk lines. <br />Marilyn Anderson indicated that she had independent recollection of sending a notification letter <br />to the residents of 7631 Lake Drive. Council Member Neal indicated that the notification was <br />never received, and that he felt such correspondence should be sent by a method which would <br />produce proof of receipt. <br />Mayor Landers expressed agreement. <br />II/ Council Member Kuether suggested that another notification should be sent to this property <br />owner at th is time_ <br />