Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 11, 1997 <br />period expired on June 27, 1997, and a petition overwhelmingly against the project signed by 23 <br />S- <br />of the 36 property owners was received by Council on July 28, 1997. •`.. <br />This project was initiated by Staff as a result of discussions with a property owner who <br />experienced septic system failure and has certain limitations on his ability to replace his current <br />system. The subject property has a drainage easement bisecting the property that restricts <br />useable land for a septic system, and the ground water is high which requires a mound septic <br />system. One other property owner in the project area has submitted a septic system repair permit <br />to the City, which is presently on hold pending resolution of the overall project. This property is <br />not subject to the limitations described above. <br />Another issue related to this project is the lack of Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) <br />designation on the properties in the project area. Until the City completes its Comprehensive <br />Land Use Plan, MUSA can only be designated on properties that prove septic system failure. <br />Staff is aware of three property owners who have septic systems in need of replacement. The <br />remaining property owners must wait until the City completes its Comprehensive Land Use Plan. <br />The total estimated project cost as presented at the public hearing is $806.730. The proposed <br />assessment to each property owner was originally $25,000 to $30,000, but Staff revised the <br />assessment formula for this project and the resulting assessment presented at the public hearing <br />was $13,650 per lot. <br />Mr. Ahrens reviewed suggested options for Council's consideration, as follow: <br />1. Adopt Resolution No. 97 - 88 that does not order the project. This option could be <br />considered at this time due to the fact that the City's land use plan is not complete and the Ill <br />project is premature until such time as the plan is complete. This option does not directly <br />address the septic system failure issue that initiated this proposal. Mr. Ahrens added that <br />he has looked into the possibility of an experimental treatment system intended for <br />unique areas such as this one. <br />2. Adopt Resolution No. 97 - 88 that orders the project as presented in the feasibility report. <br />This includes the installation of sanitary sewer and water main in the entire length of <br />Marvy Street and Leonard Drive from Marvy Street to Bradley Street. The City would <br />have to provide interim financing for the entire project cost estimated at $806,730. <br />3. Adopt Resolution No. 97 - 88 that orders the project on a smaller scale. This option <br />could include the installation of sanitary sewer and water main to serve the three <br />properties that have shown that they have a failed septic system. Assuming that all three <br />property owners connect to the utilities, the City will receive approximately $41,000 in <br />assessments out of the estimated project cost of $400,000. If only the closest property <br />owner connects to the utilities the total cost is estimated at $200,000 with approximately <br />$14,000 collectable by the City in assessments. The project scope under this option could <br />be.adjusted to accommodate other property owners' future requests of the City. Smaller <br />projects tend to be higher on a per-unit cost basis due to the smaller quantities of work. <br />4. Return to Staff for review. <br />Considering the overwhelming opposition to this project and the lack of MUSA designation, <br />Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 97 - 88, Option 1, which does not order the <br />project. <br />