08/25/1997 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 25, 1997 5. A minor concern exists in regard to curb barrier along the site s easternmost row of parking. To define intended circulation routes and clearly delineate off-street parking spaces, it is suggested that a curb barrier be provided at the northern edge of the said parking row. Ms. Wyland stated that additional conditions for approval are that the final site plan and building design be subject to the review of the City s architectural review board, as well as its approval of proposed landscaping, trash handling, loading, grading and drainage, building height, lighting, and green area. Mr. Ahrens explained that about four weeks ago he met with County Engineer John Olson and Ashland Petroleum Company Engineer David Gibson to discuss options for access to the subject parcel. Lake Drive is the County s primary concern due to traffic conditions, as is the Apollo Drive extension. The right in/right out issue remains the primary obstacle to approval of this project. Mr. Ahrens stated that on the day of this Council meeting he received correspondence from the County recommending no access off of Lake Drive and will not accept a right in/right out arrangement. From the southbound ramps to Lilac Street there is 400 feet; from the ramps to the proposed Apollo Drive location is about 600 feet; a right turn lane is 300 feet for stacking with an additional taper distance based on the speed limit. Additionally, a short acceleration lane would be required for vehicles coming off of Apollo Drive and merging with ongoing traffic. All of this compromises the necessary distance and safety for access to Lake Drive from the subject site. Council Member Kuether asked how this proposed project would be effected if the Apollo Drive extension were not being planned. Mr. Ahrens responded that access would then have to come from Lilac Street, and the County would have the same response. Mr. Ahrens added that although the County must not deny access to individual properties, it is interested in protecting the roadways involved. Council Member Kuether asked about the timetable for Apollo Drive extension. Mr. Ahrens indicated that construction should begin next Spring. Council Member Lyden asked what traffic speed would be required to make the right in/right out appropriate. Mr. Ahrens responded that speed was not the only issue; distance comes into play, and there is too great an overall disparity to compromise or accommodate this project. Council Member Bergeson asked how utility service for the proposed project would be provided. Mr. Ahrens indicated utility installations at the time of the Apollo Drive extension would service this location. Council Member Bergeson asked for clarification of the fast food operation. Ms. Kathy Hansmann, applicant in this matter, addressed Council, explaining the basis for decisions regarding such issues as the type of fast food she might incorporate into this facility. She was not able to provide specific information regarding the fast food facet of the project; however, she explained that she has a great deal of experience in various fast food entities. Ms. Hansmann intends to operate the fast food operation personally.