Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 24, 1997 <br />Construction Start <br />Substantial Completion <br />August, 1998 <br />October, 1998 <br />Mr. Ahrens then reviewed the proposed assessments in connection with this project. In <br />accordance with City policy, utility assessments are broken down into the following categories <br />and amounts: <br />Sanitary Sewer (per acre) $1,983 <br />Water main (per acre) 2,114 <br />Sanitary Sewer (per unit) 859 <br />Water main (per unit) 1,387 <br />Sanitary Sewer (front foot) 33 <br />Water main (front foot) 23 <br />Surface Water Mgt. (per acre, residential) 4,051 <br />Surface Water Mgt. (per acre, commercial) 6,098 <br />Mr. Ahrens explained that whenever the City assesses for utilities, the assessment is broken <br />down into seven categories: The sanitary sewer and water main are assessed on a per acre as <br />well as a per unit basis. The per unit, or service availability charge (SAC), is a method used by <br />the Metropolitan Council to equate industrial or commercial properties to equivalent single- <br />family homes. Mr. Ahrens stated that within the subject project area there is a mix of residential <br />and commercial properties. The residential charges are based on a single unit charge, as was the <br />Tom Thumb store commercial property. However, according to the equivalency formula, the <br />real estate business was assessed as two units while the school district equated to approximately <br />24 units based on the number of children who attend the elementary school. Mr. Ahrens added <br />that .the front footage charge is based on actual construction cost. <br />Mr. Ahrens stated that proper notification had been accomplished by the City Clerk, which <br />included the estimated amount of each assessment. He added that the $1,000 SAC charge and <br />the required permit charges of $125 for sanitary sewer and $100 for water main were not <br />included on these notices. Additionally, each property owner is responsible for the cost of <br />extension of service from the easement or property line to the connection point. <br />Assessments would be levied at the time of connection to the utilities. Mr. Ahrens explained that <br />the time for connection will be determined by each property owner; however, in the event of new <br />construction or reconstruction of an existing sewer system or well within the subject area, <br />connection will become mandatory. He added that each property owner can elect to connect to <br />one utility at a time, with up to seven years to complete connection to both utilities. <br />Mr. Ahrens explained that financing for the proposed project would result from assessment to <br />benefiting property owners totaling $501,514, with the remainder of the cost paid through the <br />City's area and unit fund ($334,965). <br />• Three property owners attended the November 6, 1997 neighborhood meeting, including Brian <br />Schwartz, who lives on the north side of Main Street where immediate connection to the <br />