My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/24/1997 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1997
>
11/24/1997 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2015 1:32:06 PM
Creation date
1/29/2015 1:07:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/24/1997
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 24, 1997 <br />Tracts B and C meet the minimum lot requirements for the Rural Zoning District; <br />however, Tract C does not contain the 20% minimum upland. Tract A does not contain a <br />minimum of 10 acres. Should the Planning and Zoning Board determine this minor <br />subdivision to be justified, a variance pursuant to Section 3, Subd. 3.B.2.b. of the City's <br />Zoning Ordinance would be required. On a typical 10 -acre parcel, 2 acres would be <br />required to be upland. <br />Ms. Wyland stated that the Planning and Zoning Board expressed its belief that the following <br />variance criteria could be met: <br />A. That the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to her property not <br />created by the landowner. <br />B. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable use <br />for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. <br />C. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege <br />that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same <br />district. <br />D. That the proposed actions will not unreasonably diminish or impair established property <br />values within the neighborhood. <br />E. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br />Ms. Wyland concluded the following recommendation with regard to this minor subdivision: <br />1. Consideration of the subdivision of Tract A be subject to Planning and Zoning Board and <br />City Council approval of an amended conditional use permit to allow expansion of the <br />existing Incarnation Cemetery. Should that expansion be denied, the two acres could be <br />left with Tract B. <br />2. Should the Planning and Zoning Board determine the minor subdivision to be <br />appropriate, Tract B and Tract C be subdivided with a variance to allow the upland area <br />of Tract C to be less than 20% of the total 45.76 acres (two acres would be the typical <br />upland requirement on a 10 -acre parcel). <br />3. An easement agreement be drafted that would allow access to Tract C from tract B, <br />subject to review and approval by the City Attorney. <br />4. A $500 park dedication fee be collected for Tract C prior to recording of the subdivision <br />with the County. <br />5. Permits be obtained from Rice Creek Watershed District requiring easements over all <br />wetland areas. <br />6. The City Engineer and Fire Chief shall review and approve the driveway plan. <br />Council Member Kuether asked why a $500 Park Dedication fee is not being requested for <br />proposed Parcel A. Ms. Wyland explained that Parcel A includes the cemetery, which is not <br />subject to such a use fee. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.