Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 8, 1997 <br />offered a guarantee that the School District's November deadline can be met. Without this <br />guarantee, a labor issue could cause the City to have to forfeit on its contract with Centennial <br />School District. <br />Council Member Neal asked if there was a possibility that the construction management fee <br />could be reduced and returned for Council action without compromising the intended completion <br />deadline. <br />Council Member Bergeson requested specific intent of returning this matter to Staff for <br />additional consideration. Council Member Lyden suggested that there might be a healthy <br />discussion regarding the possibility of achieving the same end through a bid contract. <br />Council Member Neal requested explanation of line items appearing on the proposed <br />construction management schedule, such as special inspections, printing of documents, and <br />winter heat and cover. Ms. Divine explained that the winter heat and cover refers to special <br />enclosure and service should the buildings not be sufficiently enclosed by onset of winter. She <br />suggested that timely action with regard to construction management would likely eliminate this <br />possibility. <br />Council Member Bergeson reiterated the need to comply with the City's agreement with <br />Centennial School District. This measure to ensure timely completion of the project could <br />preempt serious ramifications, such as litigation should the City not meet this obligation. <br />Council Member Neal requested clarification that the present action is simply to approve <br />negotiations with the proposed construction management firm. Ms. Divine indicated that this <br />assumption is correct, and that a detailed contract proposal will come before Council for <br />consideration at the earliest possible time. <br />Mayor Landers requested clarification of the original motion by Council Member Lyden. <br />Council Member Lyden stated that his motion is to table this matter for further Council <br />consideration. <br />Mr. Wessel again recommended pursuing the use of construction management. Council Member <br />Lyden responded that the proposed fee is unacceptable. Mr. Wessel indicated that a request <br />could be made for reduction is fee, but that a comparable amount would likely be incorporated <br />into any bid arrangement. <br />Motion defeated due to a tie vote, with Council Member Bergeson and Mayor Landers voting no. <br />Council Member Bergeson moved that the City Staff and City Attorney be authorized to <br />negotiate a contract with Adolfson & Peterson for construction management according to the <br />terms presented. Mayor Landers seconded the motion. <br />12 <br />