Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 8, 1997 <br />Council Member Lyden requested that Mr. Hawkins review in detail the differences between the <br />existing and proposed amended City Administrator's employment agreements. Mr. Hawkins <br />stated that he has no personal knowledge of the contents of the current agreement and, therefore, <br />cannot comment on the differences. <br />Council Member Lyden suggested that Mr. Schumacher had removed information from the last <br />City audit relating to his (Schumacher's) sick time, and, therefore, further investigation of the <br />terms of the amended employment agreement is required. <br />Council Member Bergeson commented that the portion of the amended employment agreement <br />related to sick leave provides for 50% of the accrued sick leave to be paid at the time of <br />severance, and states a current accrued balance. He further commented that the Council <br />members who participated in the review of the proposed employment agreement did so in good <br />faith. Council Member Bergeson then indicated that the matter before Council at this time is <br />consideration of the amended employment agreement, and expressed his favor with the contract <br />based upon the following: The amended employment agreement provides for a smooth <br />transition, should the present City Administrator's employment be terminated; provision of a <br />smooth and orderly transition being the obligation of the City Council. Additionally, the City <br />Council has an obligation to take all prudent steps to prevent litigation which might arise out of <br />such employment termination; the proposed amended employment agreement seeks to <br />accomplish this end. <br />Council Member Bergeson expressed exception to the statement regarding a possible cost to the <br />City of $200,000 to terminate the City Administrator's employment. He then reviewed two <br />specific items within the contract which he indicated should be considered, as follows: Section <br />15, Benefits, states in part that "...the City would continue to provide and pay for benefits set <br />forth in Paragraphs 7 and 8." These benefits include health, life, and disability insurance. <br />Council Member Bergeson stated that the suggested term for provision of these benefits be <br />changed to "...one year, or until comparable benefits are provided by a subsequent employer." <br />The second item Council Member Bergeson addressed was a limitation on additional <br />compensation beyond that provided within the employment agreement. He stated that he was <br />informed by Mr. Hawkins that a specific provision to that effect is not required, as execution of <br />the amended employment agreement as written binds the employee to acceptance of specific <br />compensation. <br />Mayor Landers expressed agreement with statements made by Council Member Bergeson, <br />adding that the employment agreement coincides with agreements for similar employees of a <br />number of other communities like Lino Lakes specifically with reference to automobile <br />allowance. <br />Council Member Neal pointed out that Mr. Schumacher has not been provided a vehicle nor <br />compensated for use of his personal vehicle over his period of employment by the City of Lino <br />Lakes, and asked if retroactive compensation would be necessary. <br />14 <br />