Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 29,1997 <br />• Mayor Landers asked about the effect of delay on the proposed project timetable. Mr. Ahrens <br />indicated that delay would pose a problem. <br />Motion failed by majority vote. <br />Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No. 97 - 185 subject to the City Engineer <br />locating the roadway in such a manner that it has the least possible impact on adjacent properties. <br />Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. <br />Council Member Lyden asked who would determine how such action would effect property <br />values. Mr. Ahrens suggested that homeowners can request appraisals. Mr. Schumacher pointed <br />out that the cost of such appraisals would be borne by the City. Council Member Lyden <br />requested clarification that any devaluation or property damage would be specified by an <br />appraiser. Mr. Ahrens explained that such effects would be noted in an appraisal report. <br />Council Member Neal reiterated concern that consideration of this proposal was not properly <br />prepared for on the part of Staff. <br />Motion carried, with Council Members Lyden and Neal voting no. <br />Resolution No. 97 - 185 can be found at the end of these minutes. <br />SECOND READING, ORDINANCE NO. 38 - 97, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE <br />LINO LAKES SIGN ORDINANCE NO. 12 - 97, SECTION IV L.b., ESTABLISHING <br />SIGN REGULATIONS OF POLITICAL CAMPAIGN SIGNS, BILL HAWKINS <br />In City Attorney Hawkins' absence, Mayor Landers presented Ordinance No. 38 - 97, as <br />amended, to Council for second reading. Mayor Landers indicated that changes agreed upon at <br />the first reading of this ordinance had been incorporated, with two exceptions: (1) three-day <br />notification prior to removal of any campaign sign, and (2) designation of an enforcement <br />authority. <br />Council Member Lyden asked why changes to Ordinance No. 12 - 97 were requested. Ms. <br />Anderson explained that initially enforcement issues brought about the need to change the <br />Ordinance. Council Member Lyden requested clarification as to primary concerns. Ms. <br />Anderson stated that complaints included unsightliness and improper placement of campaign <br />signs. Council Member Lyden asked if size was an issue. Council Member Kuether indicated <br />that she had personally received calls from citizens regarding inappropriate size. Ms. Anderson <br />indicated that communications to her in this regard had come from other candidates. <br />Council Member Lyden suggested that size was not at issue. Council Member Kuether opined <br />that the size of certain signs violated the terms of the current ordinance. Mayor Landers <br />suggested that any sign exceeding nine square feet in size required a permit. Council Member <br />Kuether asked if the minimum size requiring a permit was 4 x 8. Ms. Anderson responded that <br />she did not have that information. <br />