Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 25, 1996 <br />PRESENTATION OF A CITY SURVEY, DECISION RESOURCES, BILL MORRIS <br />Mr. Morris presented a lengthy review of the Lino Lakes survey conducted in December, 1995, <br />stating that overall the results were very positive. In summary, he indicated that 402 randomly - <br />selected residents within the community were contacted and asked a variety of questions <br />regarding the quality of life in Lino Lakes. <br />The following community trends were clearly evidenced in this survey research: <br />1. City quality of life ratings were very solid in comparison with other Metropolitan Area <br />suburban communities. Rural ambience and open space, location, and peacefulness were <br />key positive attributes, while high taxes and high growth rates were a major negative. As <br />residents look to the future, there was concern expressed about both growth and <br />development, as well as property taxes. <br />2. City services were generally well-regarded. In one area, however, park and recreational <br />facilities, residents were more critical, particularly about the limited nature of offerings. <br />At present, a moderate property tax increase would be supported by a majority of <br />residents for two purposes: Completion of the neighborhood park system and/or <br />expansion of the trail system. <br />3. Residents were very concerned about property taxes in this study, a common finding in <br />other studies across the Metropolitan Area. But even so, they proved supportive of <br />certain increases for specific purposes: A new teen recreation program director and an <br />appropriate -sized community center. <br />4. Mayor and City Council ratings, as well as City Staff ratings, were among the highest in <br />the metropolitan Area suburbs. Customer service ratings were very high among those <br />who had contacted or visited City Hall and/or had knowledge about government <br />activities. <br />5. Public safety issues were not as salient in Lino lakes as in other communities. <br />Residential crime was the overwhelming key public safety concern. In fact, a majority <br />felt property crimes had increased in the community during the past five years. In light of <br />current attitudes, an aggressive organizational effort of Neighborhood Watch programs <br />would be met with substantial residential interest. <br />6. Development preferences were clear within the residential sample. A quality restaurant <br />and/or family -style restaurant led the list of priorities. A grocery store, walking trails, <br />and retail stores rounded out the general consensus. Neighborhood commercial centers <br />also enjoyed wide support. <br />7. The City, while doing a good job presently, needed to revisit its communications efforts. <br />In particular, cable television programming should be updated and made more user- <br />friendly. Additionally, the City may wish to proceed on the design of a web site for <br />computer -literate residents. However, in light of the general popularity and effectiveness <br />4 <br />