My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/16/1996 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1996
>
12/16/1996 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2015 2:37:49 PM
Creation date
1/29/2015 1:59:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/16/1996
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 16, 1996 <br />will be ordered. However, under Chapter 429 provisions, no waiting period is required. If <br />the City Council determines that the project is appropriate and time is of the essence, the <br />project could be ordered immediately. Plans and specifications would be ordered, bids would <br />be advertised and awarded, and the costs assessed to benefiting properties. Mr. Hawkins <br />reminded the group that the City Engineer prepared a method for assessing the costs with <br />respect to this project, keeping in mind that the market value of each benefited property must <br />increase at least the amount of the assessment. This becomes an appraisal issue. <br />Mr. Schumacher questioned prior reference to an unlawful process. Mr. Hawkins stated that <br />the process is dictated by State Statute 429, adding that the public hearing being held this <br />evening is part of that process. <br />Mr. Schumacher also asked if the City is following its standard assessment policy, and <br />whether or not the subject assessments are unusual. Mr. Ahrens responded that the process <br />for this project is the standard adopted by the City, and that the numbers are typical of those <br />for such improvements. <br />Council Member Neal asked Mr. Powell if the proposed businesses could be constructed with <br />the road going out to Main Street. Mr. Powell explained that currently there is no sanitary <br />sewer or watermain service to that area, and that the proposed realigned Otter Lake Road <br />would include those services. Council Member Neal asked why the subject property owners <br />could not connect to services at Main Street. Mr. Powell explained that stubs have been <br />provided along the realigned Otter Lake Road; however, the extension of these services will <br />only provide lateral services to the area. Council Member Neal asked Mr. Scherier about his <br />plans for development of his property. Mr. Scherier stated therein lies the problem. He is <br />facing a $382,000 assessment which he must absorb until such time as a commercial user <br />expresses interest in that site. He added that he currently has adequate access and utility <br />service, reiterating Mr. Olson's statement that if the City gives access from Main Street to the <br />corner lot it should also be given to Mr. Scherier. Mr. Wessel explained that part of the <br />decision for the proposed realignment is need for the loop coming back around to service the <br />old Otter Lake Road, making that connection, and giving access to the properties along that <br />line. He added that this has been part of the plan since its inception, and that the City agreed <br />to assume responsibility for the road realignment. Mr. Powell added that the plan assumes <br />that the current access to Main Street from the old Otter Lake Road will be disconnected. <br />Mr. Wessel stated that this is why Anoka County is agreeable to the proposed layout. It <br />wants to see the current exit and entrance to old Otter Lake Road removed for safety reasons <br />and the interchange moved to the east, as planned. Mr. Wessel added that the service road <br />will have to be built fairly soon, as Anoka County plans to close off the old portion of Otter <br />Lake Road and remove the intersection at Otter Lake Road and Main Street creating the need <br />for the service road loop. Mr. Wessel also pointed out that the subject area would become <br />the only commercial quadrant in the City set to be developed. <br />Council Member Neal asked how much time Mr. Scherier would be given to pay the <br />assessment. Mr. Ahrens explained that typically assessments are paid over 15 years at 2% <br />over bonding rate. Pursuant to Mr. Powell's schedule, the assessment hearing would be held <br />in October of 1997, at which time appeals from landowners could be heard. Following that <br />hearing, the City would adopt the assessment rolls and the first payment would become due <br />with property taxes payable in 1998. <br />Mr. Scherier asked why the assessment for the service road is $222 per front foot when the <br />assessment for the realigned Otter Lake Road is only $100 per front foot. Council Member <br />Neal echoed Mr. Scherier's question. Mr. Powell explained that the Otter Lake Road <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.