Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 13, 1997 <br />operate on its own and not be supplemented by tax dollars. Considering this, staff has been <br />careful in determining utility rates for the next three years so that each utility is self-sustaining. <br />Mr. Ahrens noted the study considers revenues received for both the water and sewer <br />departments including billings received, penalties, hook-up charges, and interest on investments. <br />Expenses such as the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) sewer charges, <br />operating costs, and bond expenses for the water tower 1 are considered. <br />Mr. Ahrens used an overhead diagram to explain the City's sewer bill which is based on a flat <br />rate per connection. Since the Sewer Department has a history of being slightly low on its <br />revenues, staff recommends a slight increase of $1 per year in the utility rate from the 1996 rate <br />of $48 per quarter. Mr. Ahrens stated they assume a per year growth of 150 homes which they <br />believe is conservative since the City has seen about 200 housing units in 1995 and 1996 and <br />higher in preceding years. <br />Mr. Ahrens advised that commercial, industrial and institutional users will be charged a flat rate <br />times the number of residential equivalent unit connections rather than on water usage. This <br />change is considered to be more equitable in that sewer bills will not increase due to higher waste <br />consumption from lawn watering during summer months. <br />Mr. Ahrens explained the water bill is based on two components, a charge on water usage and a <br />flat rate per 1,000 gallons of water used. The water utility rates have been increased 5% per year <br />over the past three years and staff believes that the current rate charged for water use is adequate <br />and the flat rate can be gradually phased out over the next three years. The number of users is <br />increased at a conservative estimate of 150 additional connections per year for the next three <br />years, as done for the sewer connections. Mr. Ahrens explained that an average water use of <br />96,000 gallons per year per connection is assumed to calculate the revenue from billings. The <br />expenses to the Water Department includes the payment of the bond for water tower one and <br />operating expenses. The result of the proposed utility rate of $1.63 per 1,000 gallons will <br />provide sufficient revenue to the Water Department. Since revenue from the water usage portion <br />of the billing is capable of paying off this bond, and the bond for water tower 2, it is proposed the <br />flat rate be phased out. <br />Council Member Kuether inquired regarding the use of the term "section 8." Mr. Ahrens <br />explained it means federally assisted, as is senior housing. <br />Council Member Bergeson explained the initial discussion on discounted rates centered on <br />seniors but now it appears to be written to apply to anyone who lives in assisted housing. Mr. <br />Ahrens explained it would include all federally assisted housing. <br />Ms. Vaske clarified if the housing is backed by the federal government the City would assist. <br />For instance, if an apartment is backed by the federal government, they would get a reduced rate. <br />Mayor Landers asked if the only way to offer reduced rates to seniors is to include both senior <br />citizens and Section 8 housing. Ms. Vaske explained this would include anyone assisted who <br />could show proof of subsidy, not just the owner of the unit. <br />PAGE 6 <br />