Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 27, 1997 <br />viable, if Mr. Schreier is interested in buying piece the of property, and most importantly the <br />road alignment and the willingness of two property owners to work together. Council Member <br />Kuether seconded the motion. <br />Council Member Bergeson stated he felt the motion should simply delay the issue for two weeks <br />so the parties involved can come to some type of agreement for the improvements. <br />Council Member Lyden withdrew the motion. Council Member Kuether withdrew the second. <br />Council Member Bergeson moved to table consideration of Resolution No. 97-07 to February 10, <br />1997 in order for the property owners and city to meet together with an objective of improving <br />the road alignments. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried <br />unanimously. <br />Consideration of Resolution No. 97-08, Declaration of Intent to Bond Otter Lake Road <br />Improvement Project - Council Member Bergeson moved to table the consideration of <br />Resolution No. 97-08, to February 10, 1997. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />Consideration of Resolution No. 97-09, Determining the Necessity for and Authorizing the <br />Acquisition of Certain Property by Proceedings in Eminent Domain, Otter Lake Service <br />Road Street and Utility Project - Council Member Lyden moved to table consideration of <br />Resolution No. 97-09 to February 10, 1997. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />Consideration of Resolution No. 97-10, Accepting Feasibility Report and Waiver of Public <br />Hearing, Trapper's Crossing, 2nd Addition - Mr. Ahrens reported on June 24, 1996, City <br />Council declared the petition adequate and ordered preparation of a feasibility report for <br />Trapper's Crossing, Phase 2 Street and Utility Improvements. The report is now complete. The <br />property owner has waived his right to a public hearing. <br />Council Member Bergeson noted there are two parts to the motion. The first portion would be to <br />accept the feasibility report. There is no reason not to accept the report. The second portion is <br />the implementation of the improvements. Council Member Bergeson stated he felt it may be <br />appropriate to delay action on the second portion to allow staff to do research on some of the <br />concerns which were mentioned in the Open Mike portion of the meeting. <br />Mr. Ahrens noted the report had been completed for both Phase 2 and Phase 3. At the time of the <br />ordering of the report, he had forgotten that there was a Phase 2 and a Phase 3. He noted the <br />resolution only addresses Phase 2. <br />Council Member Bergeson moved to approve Resolution No. 97-10. Council Member Lyden <br />seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Resolution No. 97-10 can be found at the end of these minutes. <br />PAGE 10 <br />