Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 28, 1997 <br />and the Surface Water Management charge for a lot of 10,800 square feet is $1,004 for a total of <br />$4,275. <br />Mr. Powell reviewed the anticipated time table indicating the project could be ordered on July <br />14, 1997, advertisement for bids on August 25, 1997, opening of bids on September 19, 1997, <br />award of contract on September 22, 1997, completion of final street restoration by May 15, 1998, <br />with the assessment hearing held in October of 1998. <br />Council Member Neal stated a resident asked if they would be charged if they do not want to <br />connect to this improvement. Mr. Ahrens explained without the MUSA you must demonstrate <br />failure of the septic system to connect. If utilities and MUSA are in place, it is at the property <br />owner's discretion of when to connect. However, some mortgage companies do require <br />connection during the sale of the property. Per the City's current ordinance, connection to one <br />utility requires connection to the other. Mr. Ahrens advised the residents can maintain <br />connection to their water well for irrigation purposes. <br />Council Member Kuether stated her impression that this policy had been changed to not require <br />connection to both sanitary sewer and watermain. Mr. Ahrens stated while this had been <br />discussed by the Council, the policy was not formally changed. <br />Council Member Neal inquired regarding the term for payment. Mr. Ahrens explained <br />assessments are proposed to be assessed over a 15 -year term and assuming an interest rate of <br />7.5%, the annual assessment amount is approximately $1,530 per year. <br />Council Member Kuether asked if MUSA can be extended to allow residents to sell their extra <br />lot to cover the assessment costs on both lots. Mr. Ahrens stated this is an option if MUSA is <br />extended into this area. <br />Council Member Kuether asked if the 30% added for engineering administration and <br />contingency is an estimate. Mr. Powell explained it is common practice to add 30% to the <br />estimate. <br />Mr. Powell noted one factor which will affect these properties is the location of the house and <br />how far it is set back from the property line. He advised the cost for this connection is over and <br />beyond the assessment to the property. Mr. Ahrens reported he did reach one contractor who <br />indicated the cost is $16.50 per foot to install two service lines. <br />Mr. Powell reported that water and sewer permits (about $110 each) are also required as well as a <br />Met Council SAC charge of $900 plus $50 per year after this point in time. Mr. Ahrens reported <br />on one property where a SAC charge was previously paid and may not have been reimbursed. If <br />not reimbursed, he recommended the SAC charge be waived for that property. <br />Council Member Lyden inquired regarding the time frame for MUSA extension. Mr. Ahrens <br />estimated late 1998 or 1999. Council Member Lyden asked if the administrative fees are for in- <br />house work. Mr. Powell stated it is mostly in-house cost for administration of the assessment, <br />PAGE 3 <br />