Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 27, 1997 <br />Resolution No. 97 - 62 can be found at the end of these minutes. <br />Resolution No. 97 - 64, Order Preparation of Report on Improvement, Lilac Street Utility <br />Extension (4/5ths Vote) - Mr. Ahrens explained that Boe Ornamental is planning the <br />construction of a new building to expand their business located on Lilac Street. Their property is <br />not currently served by sanitary sewer or water and it is necessary that these utilities be made <br />available to serve the new construction. In order to accommodate their schedule to complete <br />their project this year, it is necessary that the City prepare a feasibility report to determine the <br />construction costs and assessments. Mr. Ahrens reported staff has discussed the estimated <br />assessment amounts with Boe Ornamental and they are still interested in the project. He stated <br />he has contacted adjoining property owners and reached three of the five that will be effected by <br />this project. Two indicated they were not interested and one indicated a cautious consent until <br />the feasibility report provides a better estimate of the cost. <br />Mr. Ahrens noted the properties on the south side of Lilac Street are located in the "Charter <br />Exemption" area of Lino Lakes while properties on the north side of Lilac Street are Charter <br />areas. Council could order the project and assess property owner for the improvement if a <br />portion of the property owners object to the assessment amounts. However, this is a policy <br />decision that Council will have to make depending on interest by the property owners in the <br />project. He noted staffs recommendation the feasibility report be prepared to provide a better <br />cost estimate. If the decision is reached not to pursue, this report could be used in the future. <br />Mr. Schumacher inquired regarding a rough project estimate. Mr. Ahrens estimated 1,200 feet at <br />$100 per lineal foot, or a range of $120,00 to $150,000. <br />Council Member Bergeson stated most discussion about utility service has to do with residential <br />properties and a long-term goal of the City should be to serve commercial and industrial <br />properties so a feasibility study may be beneficial. <br />Karen Boe, petitioner, stated she has nothing to add to staff's report. <br />Mayor Landers asked if this is considered a City initiated project or property owner initiated <br />project. Mr. Ahrens stated it is initiated by the property owner but since the number petitioning <br />does not meet the required percentage, it is actually a City initiated project. Thus the requirement <br />for a 4/5ths vote. <br />Council Member Kuether expressed concern since only one property owner has indicated <br />support. However, she believes a feasibility report should be done since it can be used in the <br />future. Council Member Kuether stated she may not support the project if only one property <br />owner is in support. <br />Council Member Bergeson moved to adopt Resolution No. 97 - 64 as presented. Council <br />Member Lydell seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />I':Al: 16 <br />