Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 23, 1997 <br />Council Member Lyden moved to adopt FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 17 - 97 as <br />presented. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. <br />Council Member Bergeson stated he is concerned about the 15 -foot setback for motor homes and <br />believes it is hard to regulate items that are properly licensed and proper to park on the street. <br />However, with a motor home, he questions if it is a "residence on wheels" or a "recreational <br />vehicle." With the large units, he asserted it is a residence on wheels and noted that other types <br />of residences are not allowed within 15 feet of the lot line. Council Member Bergeson stated <br />even though he thinks this is a flaw, he will vote to support the ordinance and see if it becomes a <br />future issue. Mr. Brixius explained they tried to be sensitive when determining how to identify <br />the setback line from the boulevard and the need to maintain sight lines. <br />Mayor Landers commented on the need for safety when backing recreational vehicles out of the <br />driveway. <br />Motion carried with Council Member Kuether voting nay. <br />Mayor Landers declared a recess at 8:02 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 8:20 p.m. <br />Consideration of FIRST READING Ordinance No. 12 - 97, Sign Ordinance Amendment <br />(4/5ths vote) - Ms. Wyland reported the proposed amendment to the Sign Ordinance was <br />considered by the Planning and Zoning Board at their May meeting and they recommend <br />adoption, as amended. She reviewed the proposed amendments, definitions to be added, and <br />noted advertising billboards would only be allowed in RBR districts. <br />Council Member Bergeson asked when does a sign become a billboard. Ms. Wyland explained it <br />is considered to be an "advertising sign" if located on property it is not advertising. <br />Mayor Landers inquired regarding restrictions on banners and flags. Ms. Wyland advised this <br />prevents banners that contain multiple flags or advertising a project on residential properties. <br />Council Member Bergeson asked if there are any existing business signs that will be impacted. <br />Ms. Wyland explained an existing sign (unless it is a temporary sign) would be grandfathered -in <br />and not be required to meet the ordinance unless it is replaced. <br />Council Member Bergeson asked about businesses located by freeway exits. Ms. Wyland <br />explained that this Sign Ordinance will be modified for the Town Village along with the <br />Architectural Standards. Council Member Bergeson commented on another community that has <br />a restrictive sign ordinance that has resulted in hurting businesses located along the freeway. Ms. <br />Wyland noted there has not been a lot of development at freeway intersections but if there <br />appears to be a problem, it can be reviewed again. <br />Mr. Wessel advised this issue was reviewed and businesses did not believe it was too restrictive. <br />Also, input indicated there was support to have no billboards in the community as they did not <br />result in an economic benefit. <br />Council Member Neal raised the issue of campaign signs and suggested they be outlawed <br />altogether since they arc almost impossiblc to regulate. <br />10 <br />