Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 23, 1998 <br />significant review, Staff recommends the proposed 32 -foot width for this roadway <br />reconstruction. <br />Mayor Sullivan requested clarification regarding a buffer between the 32 -foot roadway and the <br />trail. Mr. Ahrens responded that a minimum 4 -foot separation is proposed. Mayor Sullivan <br />asked about additional expense, and Mr. Ahrens explained that the acquisition of additional <br />easements will result in additional expense. <br />Council Member Dahl asked if the 4 -foot buffer would allow for adequate snow removal, as well <br />as maintenance of the trail. Mr. Ahrens indicated that snow removal should not be an issue. He <br />added that all trails within walking distance of schools are plowed. <br />Council Member Dahl asked about the area of roadway proposed to be 36 feet in width, and Mr. <br />Ahrens indicated that the parcels in that area are small and residents requested provision of on - <br />street parking. <br />Council Member Bergeson asked about the feasibility of a width greater than 32 feet. Mr. <br />Ahrens explained that 32 feet is adequate and that additional width would not afford any <br />additional benefit but would be more costly. <br />Council Member Bergeson expressed concern that authorized vehicles might not be able to be <br />parked at the side of the roadway while allowing for traffic to pass without crossing over into the <br />oncoming lane. Mr. Ahrens indicated that although technically the 16 -foot allowance should be <br />sufficient, most drivers will allow for additional space in passing a vehicle. <br />Council Member Lyden asked that Mr. Ahrens share statistical information, to which Mr. Ahrens <br />responded referencing a State Aid Standards table recommending a total of 26 feet for roadways <br />such as Ware Road. <br />Mayor Sullivan asked for clarification of the prior discussion prompting the use of this statistical <br />information. Council Member Lyden explained that discussion included the definition of the <br />street in anticipation of 2020 volume and beyond, with the conclusion that the proposed 32 -foot <br />width would be more than adequate. <br />Mayor Sullivan stated that the City's transportation engineer had indicated the narrower the <br />roadway the lesser the speed. <br />Council Member Lyden moved to adopt Resolution No. 98 - 20, as presented. Council Member <br />Neal seconded the motion. <br />Council Member Bergeson stated that he would prefer additional width. <br />Mayor Sullivan expressed concern regarding the acquisition of easements. Mr. Ahrens explained <br />that eminent domain is one possibility, and price negotiation another. Mayor Sullivan indicated <br />16 <br />