My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/16/1998 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1998
>
03/16/1998 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2015 4:04:15 PM
Creation date
1/30/2015 11:27:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
03/16/1998
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAND USE PLANNING AND DESIGN <br />Date: 3/12/98 <br />Rick DeGardner, Parks and Recreation Director <br />Lino Lakes Park and Recreation Department <br />7204 Lake Drive <br />Lino Lakes, MN 55014 <br />Dear Rick, <br />Enclosed you will find a reduced copy and full size plan of a revised athletic complex layout based on the <br />following parameters: <br />• Limit amenities to the primary facilities as shown <br />• Use a layout configuration that minimizes the amount of land required to accommodate these facilities <br />while still meeting the needs of the users <br />• Create a layout that can be accommodated on a variety of properties <br />Based on these parameters, the total minimum land area we suggest you consider is 60 acres. The plan as <br />shown consumes slightly less than that, but that is based on finding the perfect parcel of land that has minimal <br />grading concerns and no wetlands or other protected areas. Also note that the configuration as shown is tight <br />with respect to the relationships between fields and parking Tots. As such, a minimum of 60 acres seems <br />warranted to allow us to loosen things up so that the relationship between facilities would be more <br />comfortable. Aso, you may want to allow yourself some reserve land for future expansion. I would suggest <br />another I 0 acres would suffice to provide reasonable reserve land. <br />With respect to location, the property previously being considered in the south-central part of the community <br />remains the most optimal in my mind for a number of reasons. First, the property is well situated for relatively <br />easy access for a large portion of the city's population — now as well as in the future. Second, this location also <br />services some of the community park needs for this area of the community, such as the hockey rinks, tennis <br />courts, basketball, etc. Third, the soil conditions appear to be more desirable in this location than the one we <br />looked at in the northeast park of the community. This is important in that the cost to provide underdrainage <br />and/or soil amendments for fields built on clays verses more sandy soils can easily range from $40,000 to <br />$60,000 per field if the work is completed by a contractor. <br />I recognize that land availability and/or the opportunity to acquire it in a timely manner are critical factors in site <br />selection.1 also recognize that you and the Park Commission have put forth considerable effort in reaching a <br />satisfactory agreement on a desirable parcel of property that simply hasn't worked out. The realities of the <br />situation may be such that the choices are simply becoming more and more limited and perhaps fast fleeting. <br />That being said, I still encourage the City to continue to pursue the earlier parcel because it is, in my opinion, a <br />much more desirable location for the complex. <br />Please call with questions. Thank you. <br />enbauer, <br />V e 'resident <br />7301 Ohms Lane, Suite 500 Minneapolis, MN 55439 Tel (612) 832-9475 Fax (612) 832-9542 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.