Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL BOARD OF REVIEW APRIL 20, 1998 <br />year when all numbers are in, the County performs a sales ratio study. Mr. Thurston, the <br />County Assessor looks at what has happened to property values in comparison to the <br />assessed ratios. He compares the actual sales to the assessed values, how much difference <br />there is, how much is attributed to new construction costs increases and how much is <br />attributed to appreciation or inflation. He then makes a judgment as to how much he will <br />increase structure values in the entire county. This is done on a mass basis and in general, <br />for the past five (5) years, there has been a 3% increase on structures only. Most real- <br />estate appraisers agree that 3% is a very good number to use in the midwest. Mr. Smith <br />noted that when he returns to a particular property in the regular four (4) year rotation, his <br />review of the value of the structures will not change unless there has been new <br />construction or some other substantial change. <br />Mr. Smith explained land values are another issue. He adjusts land values according to <br />what is happening with the actual land sales in the area. This is done on an annual bases. <br />Occasionally landowners may see a decrease in their land value. This happens when there <br />has not been enough land sales to justify an increase or the sales indicated that land <br />values have actually dropped from the previous estimates. Mr. Smith noted state <br />standards require the assessor's appraisals be within 90 and 105 percent of actual market <br />value. This year he was at 94.4% and this has been very close to the past years. <br />Council Member Lyden asked how does the upward trend in land values impact property <br />classified as Green Acres or agricultural and the tax to those owners. Mr. Smith explained. <br />in 1996, he visited every parcel classified agriculture in the City. He removed <br />approximately 35 properties from the agriculture classification and changed them to <br />residential because they did not qualify under the State criteria for the Green Acres <br />program or the agriculture classification. In some cases, there was a big impact to the tax <br />payer and in some cases it did not make much of a difference. Although property values <br />increased in areas where there were Green Acres or agricultural properties, values used <br />for these classifications stayed fairly stable at $900.00 per acre for Green Acres or <br />agricultural as opposed the market value of $3,200.00. If the Green Acres or agricultural <br />properties happened to be in the MUSA, an additional MUSA value was added. However, <br />the property owners still only paid taxes on the Green Acres or agricultural properties <br />value. As these properties become valuable and the adjustments are made accordingly, <br />those "behind the scenes" values will increase. The Green Acre and agricultural values <br />increase at a much slower rate. There is an advantage to hold onto the Green Acres or <br />agricultural properties. These properties still must meet the criteria for Green Acres or <br />agricultural properties and must reapply every year for the program. Mr. Smith explained <br />the criteria for participation in the Green Acres or agricultural program is set by the State. <br />The owner must be able to document income of at least $300.00 plus $10.00 per tillable <br />acre with a minimum of 10 acres. The City cannot impact the criteria, however, at some <br />point the State will increase these minimums and tighten the criteria because it is <br />becoming an issue of fairness. Since these two (2) tax class rates are significantly less <br />than residential homestead rates. Council Member Lyden said he is of the opinion that <br />property tax rate increases for Green Acres or agricultural properties forces people off of <br />their land. He also noted the inability of the legislature to freeze property taxes for <br />PAGE 2 <br />