Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION OCTOBER 7,1998 <br />UPDATE OF RESHANAU LAKE TRAIL, RICK DEGARDNER <br />Currently there is an easement on two (2) lots in Reshanau Parks Estates, 2nd Addition <br />for utility purposes only. For a number of years, pedestrians have used this easement as <br />an access to a trail around the north end of Reshanau Lake. One homeowner in particular <br />has insisted that he purchased his lot for peace and quiet and wanted this to continue into <br />his retirement. In addition, some of the Reshanau Park Estates Homeowners Association <br />do not want the additional pedestrian traffic that a public easement at the north end of <br />Black Duck Drive would create. <br />Rick noted that he was asked to work with the residents in this area to find an alternate <br />route for the pedestrian trail. He proposed a trail access off of Mallard Lane through the <br />Regional Park to link to West Shadow Lake Drive. This is the best option even though it <br />would cause a detour. In addition, the County would support the trail access. Rick <br />showed a diagram of the proposed trail location. He stated this option is not as preferable <br />as where the trail currently is. <br />Barbara Meus, a member of the Reshanau Parks Estates Homeowners association stated <br />the homeowners have discussed the proposed trail on Mallard Lane. It is not what they <br />want but they do see it as an alternative. She discussed the possibility of acquiring the <br />trail easement over the utility easement by eminent domain and wait to build the trail <br />until after the objecting homeowner is no longer owner of the property. Ms. Meus also <br />thought the objecting homeowner might grant the easement if the City guaranteed that the <br />trail would not be constructed until after he is no longer owner of the property. Kim <br />noted the objecting homeowner would not cooperate unless the City commits to the <br />Mallard Lane trail. Rick noted that at some point the City would want both trails. Ms. <br />Meus stated there are two (2) homeowners who do not want a direct trail because they <br />feel it is a private area. Chris stated eminent domain is an option because this action <br />would be for the public good. He said the trail should be done right the first time. Kim <br />stated a direct trail is the quickest and safest way for children to get through. She asked <br />that a discussion with the neighborhood be held before any Council action is taken. She <br />would also like to have John's comments regarding this issue. Caroline stated the <br />homeowners should be willing to give the easement for the safety issue alone. Rick <br />indicated this is not a high priority for the City at this time. However, the County plans to <br />master plan the Regional Park in 1999 making a decision on this matter important. Kim <br />asked for a neighborhood meeting and a written opinion from the police department <br />regarding safety. Dave stated a trail study determined that crime is not related to trails. <br />He can provide an officer to come to a meeting and address this issue. Rick stated safety <br />should not be the first concern. The general public has to be considered also. <br />Chris again indicated the City should use eminent domain. Kim felt Rick had provided a <br />reasonable option for the trail as opposed to eminent domain. Bob Bening suggested the <br />option for eminent domain be kept open for the future. Things change and people move. <br />The City may be able to develop a direct trail a few years down the road. <br />4 <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />