Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 14, 1998 <br />aware of the inaccuracies. One page is a wish list. She stated she wanted the public to <br />understand how close the two (2) plans really are. <br />There is one table in the Lyden/Dahl Plan which talks about the increase in community <br />development. With proper labeling, the table would show the City's commercial development <br />and housing development have increased over the last five (5) years. Another table compares <br />Lino Lakes to Maplewood, Roseville, and S. St. Paul. Lino Lakes doesn't have a 3M although it <br />has the space for something like that. Roseville has a regional shopping center. The citizens <br />have clearly stated they do not want a regional shopping center in this City. S. St. Paul has the <br />stockyards as a tax base. <br />Mayor Sullivan stated that Lino Lakes is unique to Lino Lakes and the goals of the <br />Comprehensive Plan have been developed relating to what fits for this community. <br />Mayor Sullivan continued stating that one page of the Lyden/Dahl Plan is a bibliography. <br />Twelve pages relate to cluster development which is part of the Comprehensive Plan. Four (4) <br />pages are a bibliography from the Farmland Information Library. Thirteen pages are copies of <br />the Lino Lakes Quality of Life Survey. Ten pages have one quote on each page. <br />Mayor Sullivan stated the wish list has individuality and uniqueness. The first comment is "I am <br />as interested in high density development as I am cancer". Both the 20/20 Vision Advisory <br />group and the Comprehensive Plan Task Force discussed the issue of diversity and housing. <br />Lino Lakes can not afford to over build housing that cannot be sold to future generations. When <br />you look at the demographics, the City will not have the same number in future generations as it <br />has now with the baby boomers. Diversity in housing must to be considered. <br />Mayor Sullivan went over the wish list items in the Lyden/Dahl Plan and explained why she did <br />or did not support each item: <br />Mayor Sullivan explained that she could not support the Lyden/Dahl Plan. Part of it is in the <br />Comprehensive Plan and part of it does not belong in the Plan. No one involved in the process <br />of the development of the Comprehensive Plan got all the items they wanted. Council did have <br />the opportunity to provide lists of what they wanted. The Comprehensive Plan Task Force <br />worked with experts to put together the Plan. Council was a part of the process and approved the <br />members on the Comprehensive Plan Task Force. The process of the Plan was citizen based. It <br />is a citizens Plan with comments from citizens incorporated into it. Citizens worked with <br />professionals and staff to develop the Plan. The City has made a statement about what it wants <br />to be. <br />Mayor Sullivan stated she believes it would be confusing to send the Lyden/Dahl Plan to the <br />Metropolitan Council because all elements are not included in that document. The Metropolitan <br />Council is looking for a balanced plan. The City has voted 3/2 to send the Comprehensive Plan <br />forward. She indicated she will not support the additional document. <br />10 <br />