Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 2, 1999 <br />property. This leaves them open to liability issues. The Council does not understand the <br />situation. The Council should pursue the alternate access through Mallard Lane. <br />The second homeowner said that he can say that there is no access since the land is <br />private property. He felt that unless it is your property, it is easy to say there should be <br />access. The property is private. The easement was drafted saying that the property is not <br />open to the public. This is a rekindled situation. People do not understand that his <br />property meets the first owners property. There is no easement or lane through the <br />outlots. <br />Audience comment; the Council is talking about the "common good" of the community. <br />The Council was asked to value the rights of the property owners first. <br />Audience comment; when I purchased my property I was not told that the trail and outlots <br />were private properties. This homeowner felt that there are legal obligations +a fulfill. The <br />property owners have a legal document that commits to certain things ether=it is right <br />or wrong, they have a legal document. <br />Audience comment; the root of the "blowup" is the fence. All e pathize with the <br />adjoining landowners but there is also a large number of Re • ®le who want to go with the <br />alternate trail location. The discussions should not becometained" with the threat of a <br />fence. <br />Council Member Lyden felt that t <br />take all the time that is necess <br />neighbor against neighbor <br />Audience commen <br />trail. Press <br />nsto be no right or wrong. The Council will <br />e a just decision. He asked that this not become a <br />i is '' nposition on the two (2) lot owners adjoining the current <br />t be placed on them. <br />Mayor Sullivan sat that the Mallard Trail should go forward and she was looking to the <br />RLHA to resolve the current trail situation. There are two (2) property owners in the "hot <br />seat". <br />The seconded lot owner said that he has already agreed to a short term access to the trail <br />without a fence. He has additional insurance coverage to cover any liability issues. He <br />noted that Mr. DeGardner was going to ask the City Attorney if the City could assume <br />some of the liability. Mayor Sullivan explained that the only way that can happen is for <br />the City to assume ownership of the trail. <br />Mayor Sullivan describe the Mallard Lane trail. There are some grant dollars available <br />and the City has submitted an application for funding the new trail location. <br />• Audience comment; children go to the middle school through the current trail and the <br />golf course road. What will happen during the hunting season? Will the Mallard Lane <br />Page 3 <br />