Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 8,1999 <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, BRIAN WESSEL <br />SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 21-99, Authorizing the Conveyance of Property to Ed <br />Vaughan, Brian Wessel (3/5 Vote Required) - Brian Wessel advised that as part of the land <br />exchange with Anoka County, the City acquired some property from developer Ed Vaughan that <br />was then conveyed to the County. Mr. Vaughan contested that purchase and during the trial it <br />became clear that the property the City intended to acquire was different from the property the <br />City actually acquired. As part of a settlement with Ed Vaughan, the City agreed to petition the <br />County to reconvey to the City certain small parcels of property. The Anoka County Park Board <br />and the Anoka County Board of Commissioners have agreed to reconvey some parcels of <br />property to the City as has been previously discussed. The action tonight authorizes the <br />conveyance of the property the City received from Anoka County directly to Mr. Vaughan. The <br />terms of the settlement agreement with Mr. Vaughan require this reconveyance. After the <br />SECOND READING tonight, the ordinance will be published and go into effect in 30 days. <br />Ed Vaughan, 14332 Pheasant Hills Drive, asked if the City feels they are totally done with <br />negotiations at the end of this action tonight. The City Attorney state s would have <br />complied with the terms of the settlement as outlined in the detaile ' e . greement. <br />Mr. Vaughan asked if he could bring this matter back into co i d' ees with that opinion. <br />He disagreed that the effort has been made to get back n •` island. He stated he had <br />heard two different stories, one indicating that no i was ever taken. He stated he <br />left a tape with staff that showed that part of the nd in eed taken. Mr. Vaughan stated he <br />has a letter from Anoka County Commiss' 1 angfeld indicating the attorney's office <br />stated that no part of the island was evert t aughan stated that he does not believe this <br />was true. <br />The City Attorney clarified <br />the County to return t <br />and determined there <br />t indicated that if there is upland the City would petition <br />o Mr. Vaughan. However, three staff members walked the area <br />d, as is stated in the agreement. <br />Mr. Vaughan stated he ' suppose to be involved in all of the negotiations but was never <br />informed of when they took place. He emphasized that he had stated "island" not "upland" and <br />he was to be involved in all negotiations involving the island to assure he could attempt to get his <br />part of the island back. <br />The City Attorney stated this is not a correct statement and urged Mr. Vaughan to review a copy <br />of the settlement. <br />Mayor Sullivan asked if it has been documented to invite Mr. Vaughan to the negotiations. The <br />City Attorney stated they were never directed to invite Mr. Vaughan to the negotiations and <br />there was never any obligation to return any portion of the island since there was no upland <br />property involved. <br />3 <br />