My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/08/1999 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1999
>
11/08/1999 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2015 2:25:34 PM
Creation date
2/3/2015 8:41:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/08/1999
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 8,1999 <br />Consideration of Resolution No. 99-103, Adopt Assessment Roll, Centennial Middle School • <br />Street and Utility — John Powell (3/5 Vote Required) - John Powell advised that on October <br />25, 1999, the Council held a Public Hearing for the proposed assessment to one property <br />involved in the Centennial Middle School Street and Utility project which benefited but was not <br />originally assessed. Action on the assessment roll was delayed to review a request on the Lakes <br />Addition project to extend the repayment period to 20 years. Since these are both City projects, <br />the repayment periods need to be treated in a similar manner so action on this project was also <br />delayed. The City's bond for the Centennial Middle School project also has a term of 15 years. <br />Staff recommends keeping the repayment period at 15 years, similar to the Lakes Addition <br />project. <br />Council Member Neal moved to adopt Resolution No. 99-103, as presented. Council Member <br />Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Resolution No. 99-103 can be found at the end of these minutes. <br />Consideration of Resolution No. 99-109, Adopt Assessment Roll, S <br />Powell (3/5 Vote Required) - John Powell advised that on Octob <br />Public Hearing for the proposed assessment for the Surfside A <br />developer, Bruce Hanson, objected to the Surface Water M <br />project which totaled $9,365. Staff presented the findin <br />assessments, including the SWMC, be assessed as 1 osed. <br />Council Member Dahl moved to adopt Re <br />Neal seconded the motion. Motion c <br />Resolution No. 99-109 can be, <br />us <br />y <br />ddition — John <br />e Council held a <br />earing, the <br />ges (SWMC) for his <br />ch and recommended the <br />109, as presented. Council Member <br />e en s' of these minutes. <br />Consideration of R io . 99-111, Adopt Assessment Roll, Highland Meadows East — <br />John Powell (3/5 Vot :, ) - John Powell advised that on October 25, 1999, the Council <br />held a Public Hearing froposed assessments for the Highland Meadows East project. The <br />proposed assessments in de sanitary sewer, watermain, and surface water management charges. <br />At the hearing, representatives of the Highland Meadows subdivision asked why the Highland <br />Meadows East subdivision was not assessed for 79th Street reconstruction costs. It was noted <br />that Highland Meadows East includes six residential lots and two outlots, A and B. Two of the <br />proposed lots contain existing houses that are to remain. Therefore, the current plat contains four <br />new houses that will front on 79th Street. It is staffs opinion that the additional traffic generated <br />by four new lots is not sufficient to require reconstruction of the roadway. Highland Meadows <br />East also includes two outlots. At such time as this outlots are replatted, the City will have to <br />consider the proposed land use intensity and a contribution from the developer for the upgrade of <br />79th Street. However, based on the current information, staff does not support placing a street <br />reconstruction assessment against the Highland Meadows East subdivision. <br />Council Member Bergeson moved to adopt Resolution No. 99-111, as presented. Council <br />Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />6 <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.