My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/14/2000 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000
>
02/14/2000 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2015 2:30:54 PM
Creation date
2/3/2015 10:05:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
02/14/2000
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 14, 2000 <br />Mr. McGowen indicated the applicant is aware of the petition. He stated that is why the <br />applicant started with a 35' setback and then moved it 5' to the front. <br />Staff advised City sewer should not have an impact on where the house is located. <br />Council Member O'Donnell indicated he is in support of maintaining some type of natural <br />vegetation. He stated the City needs to start somewhere. <br />Mayor Bergeson advised the lots were laid out a long time ago. The other lots were not required <br />to have this condition. He stated it seems unfair to ask this applicant for the 40' and not the <br />others. He noted that most lakes within the City are classified as environmental that have higher <br />standards. This lake is classified as recreational. <br />Council Member Carlson noted the lots in Country Lakes Estates are deeper and have a higher <br />elevation. She asked what the setback would be for this lot if it were sewered. <br />Staff advised the setback would be 75' and the shore impact zone is h <br />Council Member Dahl moved to approve the variance as reque .'*' following <br />conditions: <br />1. The home is constructed at the t k line with a varied lake <br />setback of 71' to 84'. <br />2. A revised survey d vi ed for building permit purposes. <br />Mayor Bergeson seconded th i <br />ed e <br />�.. <br />Council Member Da lieves 40' of natural vegetation is asking too much from the <br />applicant. If all lots h.F� requirement there would be no problem. <br />The City Attorney advis that if the motion fails another motion can be made. <br />Motion failed with Council Member Carlson and O'Donnell voting no. <br />Council Member Carlson moved to approve the variance as requested based on the following <br />conditions: <br />1. The home is constructed at the 30' front setback line with a varied lake <br />setback of 71' to 84'. <br />2. A revised survey document is provided for building purposes. <br />3. Maintain 20' in native unmowed vegetation in the shore impact zone. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.