Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 14, 2000 <br />5. Conditions of approval must be met (the conditions approved at time of <br />preliminary plat approval) <br />The submitted final plat shows some difference. First, the Apollo Drive alignment is slightly <br />different. This is because the final plat uses the alignment supplied by the City. This slight <br />adjustment in a road alignment is not a concern. <br />More importantly, the final plat creates additional outlots. Instead of three (3) outlots, there are now <br />five (5). The reason for this is that the developer encountered difficulties acquiring a mortgage for all <br />the property. The final plat breaks the property up in a way that allows the developer to obtain a <br />mortgage on a portion of the site. <br />Staff indicated their concern with this is that the change must not create additional buildable lots. The <br />developer's attorney has stated that the developer agrees to a stipulation that the lots are not buildable <br />until the plat is revised. This is stated in a letter dated February 4, 2000, to Bill Hawkins from Gary <br />Gandrud. <br />Staff advised that as long as the City Attorney assures the City tha <br />the City is protected from any claim to additional buildable lot <br />arrangement can be given by staff. <br />nt is enforceable and <br />tion to approve of the <br />The City and the developer have been negotiating extension of Apollo Drive. At the <br />December 20, 1999, Council meeting, the Counci ppro gad initiating an eminent domain action and <br />a feasibility study for the extension of Ap ' the Apollo Drive extension now will be a <br />public project, the developer does not s.v�. c the road and utilities. Therefore, the typical <br />development agreement, with its f s s iti-s, is not necessary. The City will construct the <br />road and utilities and assess t „� e b �efiting properties. <br />A new signature page -� � beep i .mitted. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved it. <br />Most of the conditions p'°'•val refer to the site plan for McDonald's. These will be addressed as <br />part of the building pe a review. Other conditions apply to the construction of Apollo Drive, such <br />as the permit from Anoka County. Since the road will be a public project constructed by the City, <br />such things become the City's responsibility. <br />The City Attorney advised the reason for the change is to obtain a mortgage. He advised he received <br />a letter from the applicant's attorney making clear that the lots are not buildable. <br />Mr. Baylor, developer for the project, confirmed that he understands the additional outlots are not <br />buildable. <br />Council Member Dahl moved to approve the Final Plat for JADT Development Group, as presented. <br />Council Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />