Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 22, 2000 <br />Council Member Carlson inquired about the new fee schedule and if it will apply in this case. Staff <br />advised the Club Fee has not changed. <br />Council Member Reinert moved to approve application for new liquor club license for the American <br />Legion Post 566, as presented. Council Member Carlson seconded the motion. Motion carried <br />unanimously. <br />Consider 2000 Liquor License Renewals (3/5 Vote Required), Ry-Chel Gaustad — Staff advised <br />the 2000 liquor licenses are scheduled to be renewed, effective July 1, 2000. Eight (8) licensees <br />tendered applications for the renewal process. In comparison to past years, the City Clerk's office <br />took the initiative to simplify the application process. By condensing the information and making <br />other adjustments on the application, 1-1/2 hours was eliminated from the processing time. The <br />expected time to complete the past application process was approximately two (2) hours. Several <br />liquor licensees noted the new liquor license renewal process was warranted and welcomed. <br />The following reflects the new time changes made to the liquor license renewal process: <br />Item Time to C <br />Application 15 <br />Certificate of Insurance <br />Liquor License Payment <br />Total Time to Process Informati mutes <br />1, :11Q <br />es <br />The City staff works in conjunction with ent of Safety, Alcohol and Gambling <br />Enforcement Division to ensure com. ' . ate and City standards. The City staff verifies <br />property tax and liquor payment, . n . i nal investigations, City Code compliance, and <br />brings outstanding concerns t• r oun 's attention. The State requires City approval prior to <br />their investigation and auth •rder for the State to complete their process, they request the <br />City to submit the req work 30 days prior to the liquor license renewal. <br />Staff referred to a sprea eat depicts the status of each license holder. It was noted that all <br />license holders, except t 49 Club, have submitted the required information. Unfortunately, without <br />the 49 Club's information, the City Clerk's office is unable to determine the status of the <br />establishment. Therefore, City Clerk's Office recommended the 49 Club be removed from Council's <br />consideration until appropriate information is submitted from the establishment. <br />The Administration Director expressed concern regarding the pending aspect of some of the <br />establishments. He suggested this item wait until the next Council meeting. <br />Staff advised the Police Department has been notified and they have no concerns regarding the <br />establishments. <br />Council Member Reinert inquired about the City notifying the 49 Club regarding their application. <br />Staff advised they have contacted the applicants several times. All the applicants excluding the 49 <br />4 <br />