Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 26, 2000 <br />The following schedule outlines the anticipated timeline. The public hearing occurred at the June 14, <br />2000, Planning and Zoning Board meeting. The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval <br />of Ordinance No. 10 — 00 with a unanimous vote of the six- (6) members present. <br />May 22, 2000 City Council meeting: initiate process for adopting 90 -day moratorium by <br />directing staff to prepare ordinance and setting public hearing date <br />June 14, 2000 <br />June 26, 2000 <br />July 10, 2000 <br />July 17, 2000 <br />August 16, 2000 <br />November 14, 2000 <br />Public hearing at Planning and Zoning Board meeting <br />First reading of ordinance at City Council meeting <br />Second reading of ordinance at City Council meeting <br />Ordinance published in newspaper <br />Ordinance effective (30 days after publication) <br />90 -day moratorium expires. <br />Council Member Dahl moved to approve FIRST READING <br />Council Member Carlson seconded the motion. <br />Council Member Carlson voted yea. Council M <br />voted yea. Council Member Reinert vote <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />PUBLIC HEARING, FI <br />Easement Vacation, <br />settlement of this matt <br />the two -(2) parties con <br />4 co. 10 — 00, as presented. <br />• <br />voted yea. Council Member O'Donnell • <br />geson voted yea. <br />G, Ordinance No. 99 —17, Oak Brook Peninsula <br />1— Staff advised no new information has been received regarding <br />r of the affected property owners. It is staff's understanding that <br />mediate. <br />Staff advised this item should be continued to the July 24, 2000, City Council Meeting. <br />Council Member Dahl moved to continue Public Hearing, First Reading, Ordinance No. 99 —17, Oak <br />Brook Peninsula Easement Vacation, to the July 24, 2000, City Council meeting. Council Member <br />Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />Consideration of June 7, 2000, Council Work Session Minutes — Council Member Carlson <br />expressed many concerns regarding the minutes. Council Member Carlson inquired whether or not <br />the previous Council had seen a four -(4) lane highway plan for Highway 49. She corrected page 2 to <br />read "amount to a multiplier of 1.5". She also expressed concern regarding the detail of public <br />comment relating to the highway project. <br />16 <br />