My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/24/2000 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000
>
07/24/2000 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2015 2:43:27 PM
Creation date
2/3/2015 1:57:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
07/24/2000
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Mayor Bergeson called for a short break at 8:05 p.m. <br />Mayor Bergeson reconvened the meeting at 8:15 p.m. <br />Minor Subdivision for David Snell, 600 62nd Street (3/5 Vote Required), Mary Kay <br />Wyland - Staff advised David Snell is requesting a minor subdivision and variance to <br />split 10 acres from a 37 -acre parcel at 600 62nd Street. The property has been in the Snell <br />family for over 50 years. The site is Zoned rural and guided for rural development <br />through 2020 in the draft Comprehensive Plan. The proposed parcel would have 230' <br />width on 62nd Street. The Zoning Ordinance provides that parcels in the Rural Zoning <br />District have a minimum of 330' width, therefore, a variance for 12' in lot width is being <br />requested. The Ordinance also provides that "80% of the lot area may be comprised of <br />areas which are platted as street right-of-ways, is below the 100 year flood elevation, or <br />lies within city watercourses, wetlands or waterbodies as defined by the ordinance". In <br />other words, 20% of the new parcel must be upland. The survey document indicates that <br />2.35 acres are wetland leaving 7.65 acres of upland. Sewer and water are not available to <br />serve this site, however, adequate space is provided for an on-site se stem and an <br />alternate. <br />In considering all requests for variance or appeal andin eg action, the <br />City shall make a finding of fact: <br />1. That the property in question c <br />u a reasonable use if used <br />under conditions allowed h controls. <br />2. That the plight of is due to physical circumstances unique <br />to his property e a the landowner. <br />3. That the <br />re <br />t due to economic considerations alone and when a <br />for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. <br />4. That ting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any <br />spec' privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, <br />structures, or buildings in the same district. <br />5. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of <br />the ordinance. <br />Mr. Snell believes a hardship exists in the fact that there is a septic system and drainfield <br />for the dwelling at 600 62nd Street between the home and the new parcel that limits the <br />available width for the new parcel. Staff did suggest that he consider creating this 10 <br />acre parcel on the west side of the existing home, however, that area contains a <br />considerable amount of wetland with patches of upland limiting its usability. <br />Additionally, Mr. Snell's parents have some outbuildings and fencing on this west side of <br />their home which they would like to retain. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.