Laserfiche WebLink
lots <br />Final Plat Total Lots Existing houses New house <br />3rd Addition 129 1 128 <br />4th Addition 56 4 52 <br />Total 185 5 180 <br />Building Permits Issued Through July 18, 2000 <br />Maximum total permits <br />Through year 2000 <br />Actual number of permits issued <br />Through 7/18/00 <br />Remaining for year 2000 <br />135 <br />70 <br />65 <br />Only 70 permits have been issued to date in the entire development. 's less than the <br />1999 allotment, and leaves 65 before reaching the maximum li 't a Vis, ough year <br />2000. Staff will monitor the number of building permits to e p 3 = plementation <br />of the phasing plan. The phasing plan has been incorpor opment <br />agreements. <br />There are three (3) lots in the southeast corner <br />of the current MUSA (Lots 14, 15, 16, B <br />plat in order to construct the roads an <br />these lots will not receive buildi <br />development agreement as we <br />tion that cross the boundary <br />lots must be included in the final <br />vicinity. Until MUSA is available, <br />restriction is included in the <br />Council Member Carlso ed he term "substantially conforms" and inquired <br />about the differenthe preliminary plat and the final plat. Staff advised the <br />City is fairly strict r preliminary plat substantially conforming to a preliminary <br />plat. The main diff- ce in this case is there are four (4) lots that are not included in the <br />final plat. Staff refe - d to a map indicating the four (4) lots. <br />Council Member Carlson moved to approve the final plat and development agreement, as <br />presented. Council Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />PUBLIC HEARING, FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 17 - 99, Easement <br />Vacation, Oak Brook Peninsula, John Powell - Staff advised no new information has <br />been received regarding settlement of this matter from either of the affected property <br />owners. It is staff's understanding that the two -(2) parties continue to mediate. <br />Staff recommended continuing this item to the December 11, 2000, City Council <br />meeting. This is to eliminate the effort required to continue this item on a monthly basis. <br />However, at such time that staff is contacted by either party this matter with new <br />