My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/24/2000 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000
>
07/24/2000 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2015 2:43:27 PM
Creation date
2/3/2015 1:57:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
07/24/2000
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />well ans septic systems. Staff referred to the Lakes Addition project that resulted in <br />property owners paying 25% of the costs of street reconstruction and storm sewer. <br />Mayor Bergeson reminded those present that the Lakes Addition project did not come out <br />of the general fund. Voters approved the project. The prioritized list would be put on a <br />ballot for voters to decide. The same process will be used for other streets that are on that <br />list. The Council has asked the City Engineer to re -prioritize again incorporating well <br />and septic systme conditions. <br />Staff added the next ballot will be in the fall of 2001 for 2002 - 2003 construction per <br />direction from the Council and Charter Commission. <br />Mr. Bye read the Charter regarding assessments and asked if that will be considered. <br />Staff advised that if the project proceeds it may have to be placed on the ballot this fall. <br />Mr. Bye stated that a number of the residents need to do something <br />systems. He asked what is available to solve the problem. He i <br />though he is being told there is nothing he can legally do. W <br />The City Attorney asked if emergency situations all <br />was noted that staff has talked to the Health De <br />to eliminate the problem unless there are exte <br />eir failing <br />eels as <br />dents do? <br />ility assessments. It <br />sid is do have a time limit <br />tances. <br />City y s o provide the Council with <br />The Attorney advised that emer ,�� <br />flexibility. In relation to assess - _.= must be proven. <br />Mayor Bergeson stated t <br />Board that what is more <br />been explored rela <br />es there is a notion within the Planning and Zoning <br />s preferable to less conforming. That notion has not <br />is systems. <br />Staff noted the City lowed to be more restrictive relating to septic systems. The City <br />cannot be less restric ve than the County or State. <br />Mayor Bergeson suggested Council Members meet with staff to discuss options. <br />The City Administrator asked if staff is aware of which systems are failing. Staff advised <br />they have not done on-site inspections due to the appearance of forcing assessments on <br />residents. <br />The City Administrator stated she believes it is appropriate to convene a staff group to <br />meet with residents. It is not the intent of the City or Council to leave residents hanging. <br />Staff, residents, and Council can work together to find a solution. <br />Mayor Bergeson stated a group meeting can be pursued. The staff recommendation is <br />not to proceed with the project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.