09/25/2000 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 25, 2000 Mayor Bergeson suggested the possibility of added the following phrase to the motion to be conveyed to the Metropolitan Council: "Money be used to help with purchase of land and/or infrastructure." Council Member Carlson stated the City has two (2) decisions to make: is the city going to be a developer and is the City going to finance the project. The City does need to move forward but is not committing to financing the project and be the developer. The motion should be amended to included that the Council has not yet decided if it will be lead developer and may not help with the funding. Mayor Bergeson suggested Resolution No. 00 — 79 be tabled until later in the evening. Staff will review the resolution and make possible changes in the language. Council Member Reinert moved to table Resolution No. 00 — 79 until later in the meeting. Council Member Carlson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consider Otter Lake Road, Minor Subdivision (3/5 Vote Require s eff Smyser — Staff advised the City has purchased land for ponding and wetland mitigation ine C e ater Creek light industrial area. The purchased land must be divided from the 1 �er cel. Staff referred to a sketch and description that indicates the parcel to be created by the Amo ub. ' ion. The NSP power line strip is a parcel in itself, not just would be concerned about creating a parcel that is bi discussion with the City Attorney, staff has resol ponding, there is no danger of a claim to a build to a letter from Mr. Hawkins indicating su ea men a'l this were a private action, staff s way by another parcel. After . Since this is to be City land for n either side of the NSP land. Staff referred The remaining parcels to the north g enough to support development. Staff noted the Planning and Zoning Board voted •ve minor subdivision. Council Member Dahl asked pplit is present. Staff advised this is a City project. Therefore, the City is the , .plic Council Member O'Donne o used to approve the minor subdivision, as presented. Council Member Reinert seconded the motio Motion carried unanimously. Consider Central Suburban Inc. Site Plan Review (3/5 Vote Required), Jeff Smyser — Staff advised the application includes a site plan and conditional use permit. The applicant, Central Suburban, Inc., proposes to build an addition on the existing building and use the site for its land development and construction business. All site and building plans for industrial uses requires a site plan review. The existing building is a pole barn. The expansion of a pole barn in an industrial district requires a conditional use permit. Central Suburban will use the fenced yard for storage of trucks, equipment, and material such as pipe, • manholes, culverts, lumber, sand, gravel, and the like. Under the current zoning ordinance, outdoor