Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION OCTOBER 4, 2000 <br />The City Administrator stated the Council needs to see a final signed copy of the letter <br />and vote on it Monday night. <br />Council Member Carlson inquired about the difference between using the funds for <br />infrastructure or acquiring the property. She stated the City has a bargaining tool if it has <br />funds for infrastructure. There are still serious questions that have to be answered. The <br />Council needs more information. <br />Council Member O'Donnell clarified that the City is taking a "but/for" position. He <br />stated the project needs to make economic sense to everyone involved without the $1.5 <br />million. If the funding is received, it should benefit everyone in the City. <br />Council Member Reinert asked if staff has indicated that the plan will not happen without <br />the $1.5 million. Staff advised the plan would not happen today without the funding. <br />The plan would take some time to implement. Timing is an issue 4 the City needs to <br />be competitive. <br />Council Member Dahl asked if staff has indicated that th <br />number of units per acre. Staff advised the committee <br />City will receive fewer points for lower density. T - C <br />design standards regarding density. <br />Mrs. Elise Tagg, property owner, stated the <br />stated she disagrees that the funding sh <br />landowners. She stated she is givin <br />Council Member O'Donnell cl <br />the $1.5 million in funding. <br />Council Member Rei rt refe o a past proposal regarding the Livable Communities <br />Program noting the ho s were lower. Staff advised negotiations with the <br />developer will take pla reg ding the number of housing units. <br />ngent on a certain <br />umber of issues. The <br />ds to focus on the <br />ould make economic sense. She <br />enefit the developers and <br />for e City. <br />e plan needs to make economic sense without <br />Council Member Reinert stated the process started with half as many units as the current <br />plan has. Developers have indicated that 16-18 units per acre will work. Staff advised <br />the developer has indicated those numbers will work conceptually. <br />Council Member Reinert stated the Council needs good accurate information. Staff <br />advised they are making assumptions and the plan is conceptual. <br />Council clarified that the revisions in the plan should included 16-18 units per acre. <br />The Finance Director came forward and stated he will answer any questions that the <br />Council has. He stated that so far, he has not heard any financial questions. He stated the <br />City can explore financial implications when the City knows which direction it will take. <br />