My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/04/2000 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000
>
10/04/2000 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2015 1:37:02 PM
Creation date
2/4/2015 9:46:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/04/2000
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION OCTOBER 4, 2000 <br />CSAH 49 RECONSTRUCTION UPDATE, JOHN POWELL <br />Staff inquired about any additional questions the Council may have to forward to the <br />County. The County has provided a specific response to questions. Options for the <br />project have not been explored. <br />Council Member Reinert advised he would like to review options for the plan. Staff <br />advised a letter will be sent to the County Engineer requesting possible options. The <br />letter will indicate the options should be available for the November 8, 2000, meeting. <br />Council Member Reinert suggested the City have a meeting with everyone involved with <br />the project to come up with a solution. <br />Council Member Carlson stated she has seen different plans from the County. The <br />County has shown a 120' right-of-way with a path. The County's ...onse indicated the <br />120' did not include a path. She stated she needs clarity regar. g the • unty's proposal. <br />Staff advised the trail can not be confined in a 100' right- -w iri ' areas of the <br />roadway. <br />Council Member Carlson stated she would like t =••ns and then be prepared to <br />take a vote. The key point on their proposal ', . seme' t. Staff advised they will <br />convey to the County what the Council is c. orta.. with and ask for a response. <br />Council Member O'Donnell request • ation on the impact of all the properties <br />along the roadway. <br />Staff asked the Council for i e arding what they are looking for in the plan. <br />Council Member Car . on stat a is waiting for the County's proposal. <br />Staff clarified that the cn is looking for a proposal that minimizes the right-of-way <br />and impact. The City of oreview is looking at shared turn lanes. <br />Council Member O'Donnell advised he is willing to look at other options that don't <br />included the median. <br />Council Member Carlson asked if the County is willing to have three (3) lanes with <br />shared turn lanes. <br />Council Member Reinert asked if the roadway will have to be four (4) lanes immediately <br />after construction. He suggested the four -(4) lanes be phased in over time. <br />Council Member Carlson suggested the bridge be built wider than the roadway for future <br />use. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.