Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION NOVEMBER 8 200 <br />Council Member O'Donnell advised he needs that level of detail to better understand the <br />impact and to take a vote. Mr. Olson stated the City Engineer has the information to <br />determine which properties are non -conforming. <br />Council Member O'Donnell stated he needs to know how many homes and businesses <br />will be lost and which ones. <br />Ms. Langfield stated the City does not have to conform. There are creative things that <br />can be done. Some homes and businesses will have to be moved. <br />Council Member O'Donnell advised he can not make a decision without that information. <br />Mayor Bergeson directed the City Engineer to work with the County to get a summary of <br />that information. The City Engineer advised that information can be obtained. However, <br />assumptions about the roadway will have to be made. <br />Mr. Olson stated information about the appraisal will not be <br />property owner will lost approximately 17 feet. <br />e average <br />Council Member Reinert stated the big concern is t a . th o e roadway and right-of- <br />way. He asked why the County can't build a roathan 100' feet of right-of- <br />way. Mr. Olson advised the County is buying ht -o ay so it won't be an issue in <br />the future if it is needed. Additional right -o sway i ' eeded for utilities and a path. Most <br />of the right-of-way will be green space t �� ada constructed under the minimum <br />design, it is probable that the road w to . e widened in the future. A standard <br />arterial roadway in Anoka Count of right-of-way. <br />Council Member Reinert st <br />way. He stated he would <br />reasonable but flexib'_'t is <br />ounty is pushing the limits with 100' of right -of - <br />other option. Option C seems to be the most <br />Mr. Olson stated he has is . rection regarding the design of the road from the County. <br />Council Member Reinert stated his goal is to have the road constructed in as small a <br />space as possible. Mr. Olson explained the reason for different widths of a roadway. <br />Council Member Reinert asked if there are any variations possible regarding the width of <br />the berms and median in option C. Mr. Olson stated he believes the City will be very <br />unhappy with option C. Option C is available except for the intersections at Ash and <br />Birch. <br />Council Member Carlson asked if option C will be wider and Birch and Ash. Mr. Olson <br />advised option B would be used at the intersections of Birch and Ash. <br />