My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/14/2001 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2001
>
05/14/2001 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2015 2:25:53 PM
Creation date
2/4/2015 1:54:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
05/14/2001
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 14, 2001 <br />City Engineer Powell advised the CDBG grant was included in the computation of the assessments. <br />The grant was not enough to cover assessments compared to the appraisals. That is why staff has <br />submitted an alternative project to include Twilight Acres only. <br />Ms. Brunberg stated that technically, the assessment amounts are not different than one year ago. <br />City Engineer Powell reviewed the assessment figures from a year ago to the current figures noting <br />the charges that did stay the same. <br />Council Member Carlson inquired about the lateral sewer figure from last year's calculations. City <br />Engineer Powell advised the lateral sewer figure from last year is $3,104.50 per unit. <br />Ms. Brunberg stated there is confusion as to where the grant money is going because the street is not <br />being torn up. The residents will bear more of the cost in the long run. The project does not include <br />storm sewer and street restoration so the project should cost a lot less. <br />City Administrator Waite Smith stated the cost will increase al' <br />running two (2) pipes as opposed to one. However, there is <br />year's figures. <br />se the project includes <br />vings compared to last <br />City Engineer Powell reviewed the figures for the res 1 Nancy Drive. Last year the figure <br />was $25,518 and the current assessment is $8,36 e is ch less improvement included in this <br />proposal but the cost is much lower also. <br />Ms. Brunberg stated the assessment am•. 1 does not meet the appraisal figure. <br />Acting City Engineer Wedel revie <br />and Second as compared to Tw. <br />approximately $3,500 per lot <br />on from the assessment rolls for Twilight Acres First <br />es First Addition only. The cost for Twilight Acres First is <br />to $6,000. <br />Mr. Dick Paulson, 789 Vi came forward and thanked the Council for all their work on this <br />issue. He asked why there a c arge if there is no storm sewer and what the cost will be if residents <br />decide to hook up. <br />City Engineer Powell advised there is a drainage charge per an ordinance adopted in 1992. Storm <br />sewer construction has been eliminated from last year's figures. Sanitary sewer connection costs will <br />vary depending on usage. The connection cost does include the permit fee, service availability charge <br />that goes to the Metropolitan Council, and plumber fees. When comparing the two (2) proposed fees <br />to the feasibility study, there is a reduction in the cost. <br />Mayor Bergeson inquired about an area charge if storm sewer goes into the area in the future. City <br />Engineer Powell advised property owners have already incurred an area charge. Residents would <br />have to pay for the pipe that goes into the street. Storm sewer would probably not be installed for 5- <br />10 years down the road because the street itself is in good shape. <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.