My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/23/2001 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2001
>
05/23/2001 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2015 2:25:30 PM
Creation date
2/4/2015 2:06:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
05/23/2001
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MAY 23, 2001 <br />Council Member Carlson asked for assurance that the City will not be asked for more <br />money. <br />Mr. McHale advised the City will not be asked for any additional assistance and <br />documentation indicating that can be provided. <br />City Planner Smyser stated staff needs to figure out a mechanism for the additional pads. <br />Outlots are an option. <br />Mr. McHale stated each additional project will need Council approval as well as approval <br />from Target and Kohls. <br />EAW Overview, Jeff Smyser — City Planner Smyser advised Minnesota state statutes <br />requires environmental review for certain projects. Rules written by the Minnesota <br />environmental <br />innesota <br />Environmental Quality Board (EQB) describe the requirements fo <br />review. These rules were written to implement MN Statute 11 <br />Environmental Policy Act. <br />Staff has reviewed the information submitted by the p <br />Marketplace project. This project includes a Targe Su <br />approximately 35,000 sf of smaller retail buildin <br />and is comfortable recommending that the E distn <br />Resolution No. 01— 71 approves the distrib <br />Worksheet for the Lino Lakes Marketp <br />Approving the EAW for distri <br />is accurate and complete to th <br />hidden implication regardi <br />the document. Approvin <br />approving the project On <br />be started and no gove <br />environmental review <br />r on the Lino Lakes <br />ohls, and <br />as amended the information <br />ted for public comment. <br />e Environmental Assessment <br />butthe City is comfortable that the document <br />owledge. There is no other commitment or <br />r6'y...of the project in making the decision to distribute <br />AW r distribution does not mean that the City is <br />rary, if a project requires an EAW, the project cannot <br />ntity can make a final decision on the project until the <br />is completed. <br />After the public comment period, the City decides if it has enough information to <br />determine if the project will cause significant environmental effects. If it will not cause <br />such effects, the City makes a "negative declaration" meaning that an EIS is not <br />necessary. If the review process reveals, in the judgment of the City, that the project will <br />cause significant environmental effects, the City makes a "positive declaration" meaning <br />an EIS is necessary. <br />City Planner Smyser reviewed the step-by-step summary of the process in detail noting <br />that 25 copies of the document will be distributed to various state agencies. The project <br />will be published in the EQB Monitor on June 11, starting the public comment period. <br />This item will be on the regular Council agenda Tuesday, May 29, 2001, 6:30 p.m. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.