Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 9, 2001 <br />Council Member Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 01— 90, as presented. Council Member <br />Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Resolution No. 01— 90 can be found in the City Clerk's office. <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT <br />Saddle Club, Heritage Development, FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 10 — 01, Rezoning (4/5 <br />Vote Required); FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 09 — 01, Comprehensive Plan Amendment <br />for MUSA Reserve Allocation (4/5 Vote Required); Resolution No. 01— 77, Preliminary Plat <br />(3/5 Vote Required), Jeff Smyser — City Planner Smyser advised this application was originally <br />scheduled for the June 11 City Council meeting, then the applicant agreed to postpone it to the June <br />25 meeting. At the June 25 meeting, the City Council tabled it, with the applicant's agreement, to the <br />July 9 meeting. Members of the Council listed a number of issues for which they requested more <br />information. These issues were listed in the letter to Heritage Develo. t on June 27 (copies were <br />forwarded to the City Council). <br />City Planner Smyser presented the staff analysis of the issue �. ste :. at t une 25 City Council <br />meeting including clarification of the Environmental Bo rew e� ation and the park dedication <br />breakdown. He also noted the original staff analysis o the n was given at the June 25 City <br />Council meeting. <br />Council Member Carlson asked what designate <br />advised when the original reserve was crea <br />how it could be used such as specific lo <br />Council Member Carlson inquired <br />west as compared to the north. <br />have a net positive impact on <br />deficit to the trunk funds. The Ci <br />from the north. This is ba <br />plat. <br />eserve refers to. City Planner Smyser <br />e Metropolitan Council laid out criteria on <br />This site is in a designated location. <br />utility charges if the City brings the utilities in the <br />neer Powell advised that utilities brought from the west will <br />ds. Utilities brought from the north would result in a net <br />uld have to find an outside funding source if utilities come <br />truck sanitary sewer and water charges generated by the proposed <br />Council Member Carlson asked about the City responsibility regarding the payment of the road <br />construction and sewer and water. City Engineer Powell advised the recommendation as is indicates <br />the watermain loop will be paid by the developer. The sanitary sewer extension will be a City cost. <br />The street reconstruction costs will be split 50/50 between the City and the developer. Trunk funds <br />will more than cover that if utilities come from the west. <br />Council Member O'Donnell referred to the public notices that were sent out and what the plat <br />indicated at that time. He asked if there were two (2) different plats with one showing a connection at <br />Kildeer and one that did not show the connection. He stated another notice was sent to the residents <br />but a plat was not included. He stated residents may have been confused or felt deceived. He stated <br />he agrees there needs to be a second access if the project goes through. He noted it is important that <br />all residents got all of the information. <br />4 <br />