My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/27/2001 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2001
>
08/27/2001 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2015 12:29:05 PM
Creation date
2/4/2015 3:39:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
08/27/2001
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 27, 2001 <br />the City should let Target go. The City won't have money for additional services that will be needed <br />if the plan is approved. The tax plan will be risky to the employees that work at the retail outlets. If <br />the taxes are raised they will not be able to afford to live here. It will be very hard to say no to other <br />businesses if the City says yes to this one. The City should welcome businesses and growth at their <br />expense. She stated she is glad there will be another meeting. She asked that the Council deny the <br />tax abatement because it will end up costing the City and residents. <br />Mr. John Johnson, 261 Elm Street, stated the property is currently bringing in some taxes. With the <br />abatement those taxes will be lost. He asked that the Council think about this some more and if an <br />abatement is given, it should be much less. <br />Mr. Don Dunn, 6885 Black Duck Drive, stated he is definitely for this project because it will be good <br />for the City and citizens. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes the land as shopping center. The <br />property now only generates $21,000 in taxes. The land is vacant and does not generate revenue to <br />support City services and amenities such as parks. The City can't afford not to do this. If the <br />development does not come, what will there be to abate? Maybe the citize are confused because <br />this is not going after the taxpayer's money. It is simply deferring mo "° th ty would not have <br />without the development. The retailer does have a lot of money b o f y 1 not come here <br />without the City participation. He asked if any development w • a c 4 :le on that property. <br />Lake Drive is commercial and the buyers in that area kne t w't. ar will develop. People have <br />a right to live somewhere and Lino Lakes is not an isl. an b parated. He stated he wished <br />the numbers for the road were available this even _.. e l . gures were $1.3 million with the <br />County having the majority of it and apparently t Co has lowered that. This decision should <br />not be based on emotion but facts. The C. o a' ept that staff has done what they can. He <br />stated he does not see Lino Lakes invest's because the City does not have the money <br />to invest. Maybe a seminar shoul , � - d t figures. It takes money to run a City and <br />commercial development is n -, indi & . ted he does not see any reason not to approve this. The <br />City needs revenue and thi ea her opportunities. Tax structure is needed and there are <br />ways to get it. It is se . mon- d is not very much compared to what it will bring into the City. <br />Revenues need to be o - d t: • e able to better protect the environment. The Council needs to <br />separate emotion from t. lot of our children will work there and invest that into their future. It <br />will do a lot of good for;=the community. Those who do not like it can become elected officials <br />themselves. The City needs this and it should be approved. <br />Mr. Steve Baker, 7747 Carol Drive, stated he lives near the project and will be directly affected. He <br />expressed concern about losing the ambiance of the county. He stated if he wanted to live in <br />Shoreview he would have moved there. The developers are taking advantage of the City. <br />Ms. Cindy Cook, 7748 Carol Drive, stated she moved here six (6) years ago and she believes people <br />will leave the City if this project goes in. She stated she has a lot of wildlife in her backyard and does <br />not want to lose that. If Target wants to come here they should pay. <br />Mr. Mark Stone, 890 Oak Lane, stated the original plat showed a flat section and wetlands. It looks <br />as though now the wetland has been taken out. There has been a lot of miscommunication. He <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.