Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 10, 2001 <br />• person on the Council said a five -(5) year term is acceptable. He stated he needs to do what is right <br />for Lino Lakes. <br />• <br />Council Member Carlson stated she also received a copy of the flyer and she responded to the <br />statements on the flyer. She indicated she may have been pressured regarding her vote on this issue. <br />Council Member Reinert stated he has not pressured anyone regarding his or her vote on this issue. <br />Council Member Carlson read from the Comprehensive Plan regarding the objective of lowering the <br />tax rate. She reviewed the tax rate for the past few years. She expressed concern regarding how <br />much the abatement involves and the term. She added it was said that the land is commercial, but it <br />has been changed to mixed use. The Citizens Survey did not include the approval of a big box <br />development. Fees for the surface water management fund have always been collected. It is not fair <br />to allow big development not to pay also. She referred to the development in Blaine and stated more <br />money was paid for that land and $100,000 went to the park department. She stated that perhaps a big <br />contribution will come from Target for the YMCA in the future. The Coun .1 is very committed to <br />the YMCA. She stated that on her first vote for the plat, she asked tha ,�be g = ed to resolve <br />outstanding issues. She stated she did vote to approve it, but by t c+ s �. vo the issues had not <br />been resolved and they still are not. She added abstaining had t q ° e egality of this issue. <br />Council Member O'Donnell moved to adopt Resolutio 0 — 1 , , as presented. Council Member <br />Reinert seconded the motion: <br />Council Member O'Donnell stated he has s good and bad about this development and <br />talked to everyone that called him who • it. e stated he has heard over and over that <br />residents are not against Target, b char g. abatement. He indicated he believes the City <br />could come up with a develo. t °= . doe of cost the City anything, but will not have the <br />amenities the City is askin: . = e g :�• he feels the City has to participate to get those amenities. <br />This project will allo or of •pportunities. If this project is lost, something else will go there, but <br />what type of developmk, 11 i .e? The County and school district taxes will be paid. He stated he <br />thinks this is planting ar future tax reductions. He advised the proposal is asking residents to <br />defer the taxes for five ) years and he does not feel taxes will be raised if the City does that. He <br />added he believes the money spent in this community will be a good thing. The issues on 77th Street <br />are still a concern. Other than 77th Street, this project is a good thing. <br />Council Member Dahl stated Council Member Reinert indicated taxes will not go up, but they will <br />not go down either. The McDonald's plan is going before the Planning and Zoning Board in October <br />due to some revision. The two acre parcel the City has to purchase was a result of what the previous <br />Council was advised to do. The City does have a TIF district and it has been indicated there is <br />nothing that can be done about that. She stated she did not receive the flyer and she has thought about <br />this for a long time. She stated that from the very beginning she wanted Target to come here, but she <br />also asked about financial assistance. She stated she is not in favor of tax abatement or corporate <br />welfare. The people in this state have indicated they are not in support of corporate welfare. She <br />stated she does not think people should take money out of their pockets to give to this corporation. It <br />is the Council's duty to be prudent with the tax dollars. The City has an investment in the Town <br />13 <br />