Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 22, 2001 <br />attended by the City Council because the meetings are mandated by the County and are regarding a <br />Federal program. <br />Councilmember Reinert assured Ms. Heaser the matter was very important to City Council and had <br />not been neglected on their part. He asked City Engineer Powell if the October 29, 2001 meeting <br />could be posted in time for all Councilmembers to attend. <br />City Engineer Powell stated all meetings from now on could be posted in order for all <br />Councilmembers to attend. <br />Councilmember Dahl stated she has attended the meetings but sat in the back of the room and did not <br />engage in conversation. She attended the meetings to hear citizens' concerns. She was under the <br />impression that all meetings were posted. <br />Ms. Heaser stated her concern is for all of Lino Lakes and the great impact the changes to Highway 49 <br />will have on the community. She would like to see Councilmembers enga@ -• with citizens on behalf <br />of the community. <br />Resident, 6643 Ruffed Grouse Road, came forward as the adj . .p ��ner to 1168 Ruffed <br />Grouse Court in which an above ground swimming pool has : en lt. , he Resident stated the <br />swimming pool was built in June 2001. At that time, th „ ent . d the City Building Inspector <br />to visit the property. The situation has not been re at time. He stated the Planning and <br />Zoning Board recommended for denial two (2) v ',' anc at were to result in a fence and a road <br />setback. The Planning and Zoning Board edi e swimming pool be moved at the City's <br />expense. It was the Resident's understan agreement had been made between the City and <br />the Ramsays prior to a scheduled e w ) variances scheduled for the October 8, 2001 City <br />Council meeting. The Reside i � aw . <' an agreement had been made and asked the Council <br />why he was not informed e t. The Resident stated his property value has decreased by <br />$10,000 to $20,000 s wimmingpool. The Resident stated he has met with the <br />. resu �� <br />Ramsays (the adjacent ®rty��ers) to reach a compromise. The Resident met with City Planner <br />Smyser who informed 'v ident the matter did not involve the City but rather it needed to be <br />resolved among the nei ors. The Resident was interested to know why the Planning and Zoning <br />Board recommendations were not taken into consideration, and why he as the neighboring property <br />owner was not involved in the agreement process. <br />Mayor Bergeson stated a closed meeting on October 8, 2001 resulted in the agreement made between <br />the City and the Ramsays. He clarified the Building Inspector is under the jurisdiction of the Police <br />Department. He stated Police Chief Pecchia had advised with the City Attorney and the Ramsays. <br />City Administrator Smith stated City officials needed to be onsite with the property owners to review <br />the agreement, and this meeting cannot take place until Friday, October 26, 2001. <br />City Attorney Hawkins concurred with Mayor Bergeson. He stated a negotiation between the City <br />and a property owner cannot involve a third party. <br />