Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />NOVEMBER 7, 2001 <br />MOLIN CONCRETE AMENDED CUP, IUP, BUILDING & SITE P mom , MIKE <br />GROCHALA <br />Results of Noise Test — City Planner Smyser distributed a copy of the reso <br />passed on 10/22/01, the Noise Monitoring Results contracted by the City, <br />the noise results conducted by a company hired by Molin. He noted that th <br />states the amended CUP, amended IUP and site plan shall not be in of ect un <br />analysis is performed to test compliance with MPCA noise stand <br />shows no violations of those standards. <br />Mr. Steve Platisha, SBP Associates, reviewed the monitori <br />monitoring on this project. He indicated the plant was not <br />Minnesota Standards during the monitoring periods at the 49 <br />monitoring location. <br />There was a steady source of noise present durin <br />was not present during the 10/11 or 10/22 mo <br />location. The source of this steady noise co <br />Molin plant since no other significant stead <br />noise source did cause a violation of t <br />In addition to the I35 -W noise and <br />received noise from local traffic and <br />sources in the area. Forklift t <br />10/17. The noise is above t <br />if operated before 7:00 a <br />d all the <br />f the <br />eenwoi • nve <br />oring periods that <br />'ods at the 388 Thomas Street <br />inted, but was likely from the <br />e identified in the area. The <br />not be pit <br />oise sourc <br />e stand. <br />tilled noirsource, this monitoring location also <br />obile equipment and other non -steady noise <br />g on the western edge of the site <br />e standards and would cause'a violation <br />Councilmember Carlson aske <br />Mr. Platisha stat + e wan • • test <br />locations are r ` entative o e closes <br />sting sites were chosen. <br />sidence that is close to the facility. Both <br />sidence to the facility. <br />ilmember 0 .+ ed if the noise from the forklifts is from normal operation. <br />the engine noise and is from normal operation. <br />Mr. olin came forward and stated he had received the report from Staff and <br />review . There was no specific corrective action that was recommended. Therefore, <br />he also h • besting done so the noise could be pinpointed and corrected. <br />Mr. Tim Colliton, Wench Associates, introduced himself and gave his background. He <br />stated the nighttime violation that was determined was based on an estimation of noise <br />